Website review, no card needed

modo.us logo

modo.us website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202643 issues · 78 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on modo.us, 18 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
8.6 s5.1 sApr 18Oct 37.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20265.5 s
Apr 25, 20265.7 s
May 2, 20265.9 s
May 9, 20266.1 s
May 16, 20266.2 s
May 23, 20266.3 s
May 30, 20266.4 s
Jun 6, 20266.5 s
Jun 13, 20266.7 s
Jun 20, 20266.7 s
Jun 27, 20266.7 s
Jul 4, 20266.8 s
Jul 11, 20266.9 s
Jul 18, 20267.3 s
Jul 25, 20267.7 s
Aug 1, 20267.9 s
Aug 8, 20268.1 s
Aug 15, 20268.2 s
Aug 22, 20268.2 s
Aug 29, 20268.2 s
Sep 5, 20268.1 s
Sep 12, 20268.0 s
Sep 19, 20267.8 s
Sep 26, 20267.7 s
Oct 3, 20267.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
858 ms487 msApr 18Oct 3530 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026738 ms
Apr 25, 2026777 ms
May 2, 2026815 ms
May 9, 2026789 ms
May 16, 2026722 ms
May 23, 2026636 ms
May 30, 2026552 ms
Jun 6, 2026537 ms
Jun 13, 2026537 ms
Jun 20, 2026537 ms
Jun 27, 2026555 ms
Jul 4, 2026578 ms
Jul 11, 2026599 ms
Jul 18, 2026638 ms
Jul 25, 2026652 ms
Aug 1, 2026639 ms
Aug 8, 2026627 ms
Aug 15, 2026602 ms
Aug 22, 2026591 ms
Aug 29, 2026583 ms
Sep 5, 2026566 ms
Sep 12, 2026557 ms
Sep 19, 2026546 ms
Sep 26, 2026538 ms
Oct 3, 2026530 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of modo.us (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. modo.us at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. modo.us at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. modo.us at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. modo.us at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. modo.us at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. modo.us at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. modo.us at 3.4 s3.4 s
  8. modo.us at 3.9 s3.9 s

Speed

8 to fix45
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.3 s · 655 KiB

    About 655 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    500 ms · 43 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 43 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    398 KiB

    20 images could be 398 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Main-thread work: 4.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Render-blocking requests

    350 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.

  • geocomply.com adds 178 ms

    178 ms

    geocomply.com costs a phone 178 ms of main-thread work and 362 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,763 HTML elements

    The page has 1,763 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (geocomply.com, sift.com and teakcdn.com and others), adding 403 KiB and 193 ms of main-thread time.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 219 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    25 KiB

    About 25 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    8 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8 KiB).

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    Real visitors wait 7.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.3 s

    11.3 s

    Your largest element takes 11.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.5 s

    13.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 655 ms

    655 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 655 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 468 ms

    468 ms

    Real visitors wait 468 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.13

    0.13

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 37% slower for real visitors

    +37%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.5 s to 7.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 655 ms

    655 ms

    Real visitors wait 655 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 30% faster for real visitors

    -30%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 738 ms to 530 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003

    0.003

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.8 MB in 153 requests

    2.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 153 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (49), images 956 KiB (70) and other files 90 KiB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.78 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.78 g of CO₂e: 93.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7684
  • 44 buttons without a name

    44 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    36 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (7 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (3 elements)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (21 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9281
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 130 characters

    Your meta description is 130 characters: “Thousands of Free To Play Games including Slots, Blackjack, Roulette and more with Huge Sweepstakes Prizes. Free, Fast …”.

  • Title: 33 characters

    Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “Modo | America's Super Gaming App”.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://modo.us/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 495 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://modo.us/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9691
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'addEventListener')”.

  • 22 distorted images

    22 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    76 of 78 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix40
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 495 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 495 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Register for free!”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at modo.us, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on modo.us, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25