Website review, no card needed
modo.us website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202643 issues · 78 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on modo.us, 18 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
61DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 6.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 6.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 7.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 8.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 8.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 8.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 8.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 8.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 8.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 7.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 7.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 738 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 777 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 815 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 789 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 722 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 636 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 552 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 537 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 537 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 537 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 555 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 578 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 599 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 638 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 652 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 639 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 627 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 602 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 591 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 583 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 566 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 557 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 546 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 538 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 530 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 655 KiBAbout 655 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 45
45/100Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Legacy JavaScript
500 ms · 43 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 43 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
398 KiB20 images could be 398 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Main-thread work: 4.0 s
A phone's processor spends 4.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Render-blocking requests
350 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.
geocomply.com adds 178 ms
178 msgeocomply.com costs a phone 178 ms of main-thread work and 362 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,763 HTML elements
The page has 1,763 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (geocomply.com, sift.com and teakcdn.com and others), adding 403 KiB and 193 ms of main-thread time.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 219 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
25 KiBAbout 25 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
8 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8 KiB).
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 7.3 s
7.3 sReal visitors wait 7.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.3 s
11.3 sYour largest element takes 11.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 13.5 s
13.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 13.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.3 s
7.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sThe first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 655 ms
655 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 655 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 468 ms
468 msReal visitors wait 468 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.13
0.13For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 37% slower for real visitors
+37%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.5 s to 7.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 655 ms
655 msReal visitors wait 655 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 30% faster for real visitors
-30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 738 ms to 530 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003
0.003The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.8 MB in 153 requests
2.8 MBYour homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 153 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (49), images 956 KiB (70) and other files 90 KiB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.78 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.78 g of CO₂e: 93.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
44 buttons without a name
44 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Invalid ARIA attributes
36 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (7 elements)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
Heading levels should only increase by one (3 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (21 elements).
1 checks passed
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
3 links crawlers can't follow
3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 130 characters
Your meta description is 130 characters: “Thousands of Free To Play Games including Slots, Blackjack, Roulette and more with Huge Sweepstakes Prizes. Free, Fast …”.
Title: 33 characters
Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “Modo | America's Super Gaming App”.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebPage.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://modo.us/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 495 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://modo.us/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'addEventListener')”.
22 distorted images
22 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
76 of 78 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 495 words of copy
The homepage carries about 495 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Register for free!”.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at modo.us, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on modo.us, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.