Website review, no card needed

mojocrowe.com logo

mojocrowe.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202633 issues · 85 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on mojocrowe.com, 8 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.4 sMay 16Oct 311.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20261.8 s
Oct 31, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
190 ms73 msMay 16Oct 1791 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202686 ms
May 23, 202694 ms
May 30, 202697 ms
Jun 6, 2026107 ms
Jun 13, 202697 ms
Jun 20, 2026100 ms
Jun 27, 2026107 ms
Jul 4, 2026137 ms
Jul 11, 2026153 ms
Jul 18, 2026176 ms
Jul 25, 2026118 ms
Aug 1, 2026118 ms
Aug 8, 2026112 ms
Aug 15, 202688 ms
Aug 22, 202688 ms
Sep 19, 2026133 ms
Sep 26, 2026106 ms
Oct 3, 2026103 ms
Oct 10, 202691 ms
Oct 17, 202691 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mojocrowe.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mojocrowe.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. mojocrowe.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. mojocrowe.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. mojocrowe.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. mojocrowe.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. mojocrowe.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. mojocrowe.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  8. mojocrowe.com at 5.1 s5.1 s

Speed

10 to fix55
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.0 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Mailchimp and others), adding 2.0 MB and 604 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    400 ms

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 400 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    399 KiB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (399 KiB).

  • Google CDN adds 268 ms

    268 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 268 ms of main-thread work and 736 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 146 ms

    146 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 146 ms of main-thread work and 296 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mailchimp adds 67 ms

    67 ms

    Mailchimp costs a phone 67 ms of main-thread work and 353 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Vimeo adds 36 ms

    36 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 36 ms of main-thread work and 606 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 72 KiB

    About 72 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 130 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    24 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Improve image delivery

    5 KiB

    1 image could be 5 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    Your largest element takes 9.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Whether you lead a company, a team, or a very full life, Mo…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.4 s

    20.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 91 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 498 ms

    498 ms

    Real visitors wait 498 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 125 ms

    125 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 125 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.4 MB in 114 requests

    3.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 114 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (41), fonts 494 KiB (10) and other files 395 KiB (23). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.97 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.97 g of CO₂e: 116.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8793
  • 6 tap targets too small

    6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9186
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at mojocrowe.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 21 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 21 pages on mojocrowe.com and 6 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 138 characters

    Your meta description is 138 characters: “We work with organisations and individuals to shift their perspective to sustain high performance, build resilience and…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Perspective is the advantage.”.

  • Title: 30 characters

    Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “Mojo • The Perspective Company”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://mojocrowe.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://mojocrowe.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (537 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 linked pages hidden from search

    https://mojocrowe.com/privacy-policy and https://mojocrowe.com/terms-and-conditions are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    https://mojocrowe.com/teams, https://mojocrowe.com/individuals, https://mojocrowe.com/blog, https://mojocrowe.com/privacy-policy and https://mojocrowe.com/terms-and-conditions use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://mojocrowe.com/contact has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://mojocrowe.com/contact has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 10 internal pages checked

    We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 10 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5488
  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 412 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 412 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Learn more” and “Subscribe”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (7 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 15 testimonial or review blocks and 21 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 20 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mojocrowe.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Vercel

Company

Headquarters
Melbourne

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on mojocrowe.com, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25