Website review, no card needed

monumentmining.com logo

monumentmining.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202645 issues · 81 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on monumentmining.com, 14 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s2.3 sApr 25Oct 102.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20263.0 s
May 2, 20263.0 s
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20263.2 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
102 ms78 msApr 25Oct 1099 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 202692 ms
May 2, 202695 ms
May 9, 202696 ms
May 16, 202696 ms
May 23, 202696 ms
May 30, 202696 ms
Jun 6, 202693 ms
Jun 13, 202693 ms
Jun 20, 202694 ms
Jun 27, 202688 ms
Jul 4, 202684 ms
Jul 11, 202683 ms
Jul 18, 202684 ms
Jul 25, 202683 ms
Aug 1, 202689 ms
Aug 8, 202690 ms
Aug 15, 202696 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 202691 ms
Sep 5, 202692 ms
Sep 12, 202681 ms
Sep 19, 202690 ms
Sep 26, 202693 ms
Oct 3, 202695 ms
Oct 10, 202699 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of monumentmining.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. monumentmining.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. monumentmining.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. monumentmining.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. monumentmining.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. monumentmining.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. monumentmining.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. monumentmining.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. monumentmining.com at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

6 to fix48
  • Improve image delivery

    2.5 s · 562 KiB

    6 images could be 562 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.2 s · 420 KiB

    About 420 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 67). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Minify JavaScript

    960 ms · 179 KiB

    179 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • adnetcms.com adds 26 ms

    26 ms

    adnetcms.com costs a phone 26 ms of main-thread work and 371 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    250 ms · 70 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (70 KiB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, adnetcms.com and Google Analytics and others), adding 839 KiB and 190 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    190 ms · 34 KiB

    About 34 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 190 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 105 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 237 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    Your largest element takes 15.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.3 s

    15.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.283

    0.283

    The layout shifts by 0.283 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.19

    0.19

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.19 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 92 ms to 99 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 101 ms

    101 ms

    Real visitors wait 101 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors

    -19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 66 ms

    66 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 66 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix65
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 37 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 37 requests on a phone: images 1.5 MB (16), scripts 821 KiB (9) and fonts 126 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (635 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    233 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example tsx-50-logo.jpg at 1,600 px wide, shown at 120 px. Resized copies would save about 233 KiB.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (220 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.70 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.70 g of CO₂e: 83.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 6684
  • 16 text elements with low contrast

    16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 6 tap targets too small

    6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 form fields without a label

    5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 30 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 30 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 7561
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (29 characters)

    Your title is only 29 characters: “Home |Monument Mining Limited”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at monumentmining.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 82 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 82 pages on monumentmining.com and 2 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://monumentmining.com/.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://monumentmining.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://monumentmining.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://monumentmining.com/contact, https://monumentmining.com/corporate, https://monumentmining.com/corporate/mission-statement, https://monumentmining.com/corporate/board-of-directors, https://monumentmining.com/corporate/management and https://monumentmining.com/corporate/governance-policies and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://monumentmining.com/contact, https://monumentmining.com/corporate, https://monumentmining.com/corporate/mission-statement, https://monumentmining.com/corporate/board-of-directors, https://monumentmining.com/corporate/management and https://monumentmining.com/corporate/governance-policies and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 20 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 117 words

    The homepage has only about 117 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign Up”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Sign Up”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Matomo.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at monumentmining.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics | Matomo

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on monumentmining.com, including 17 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25