Website review, no card needed

monzanet.it logo

monzanet.it website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202634 issues · 81 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on monzanet.it, 12 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.2 s1.0 sApr 25Oct 101.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.3 s
May 2, 20262.2 s
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.9 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
187 ms124 msApr 25Oct 10144 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026137 ms
May 2, 2026137 ms
May 9, 2026132 ms
May 16, 2026131 ms
May 23, 2026133 ms
May 30, 2026135 ms
Jun 6, 2026137 ms
Jun 13, 2026138 ms
Jun 20, 2026138 ms
Jun 27, 2026135 ms
Jul 4, 2026137 ms
Jul 11, 2026137 ms
Jul 18, 2026136 ms
Jul 25, 2026137 ms
Aug 1, 2026138 ms
Aug 8, 2026146 ms
Aug 15, 2026159 ms
Aug 22, 2026171 ms
Aug 29, 2026180 ms
Sep 5, 2026171 ms
Sep 12, 2026161 ms
Sep 19, 2026154 ms
Sep 26, 2026148 ms
Oct 3, 2026143 ms
Oct 10, 2026144 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of monzanet.it (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. monzanet.it at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. monzanet.it at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. monzanet.it at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. monzanet.it at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. monzanet.it at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. monzanet.it at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. monzanet.it at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. monzanet.it at 4.5 s4.5 s

Speed

11 to fix48
  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 12.3 MB

    33 images could be 12.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.8 s

    30 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.7 s · 1,023 KiB

    About 1,023 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 53). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 204 KiB

    About 204 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 1.4 MB and 778 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    850 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 850 ms).

  • Google CDN adds 326 ms

    326 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 326 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 329 ms

    329 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 329 ms of main-thread work and 468 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,423 HTML elements

    The page has 2,423 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    250 ms · 30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 21 KiB

    21 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 151 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 226 ms

    226 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 226 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 24.7 s

    24.7 s

    Your largest element takes 24.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.2 s

    28.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.0 s

    12.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 346 ms

    346 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 346 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 137 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 162 ms

    162 ms

    Real visitors wait 162 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 525 ms

    525 ms

    Real visitors wait 525 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 34% faster for real visitors

    -34%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.017

    0.017

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.017, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 16.9 MB in 183 requests

    16.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 16.9 MB in 183 requests on a phone: images 13.9 MB (59), scripts 2.0 MB (73) and other files 357 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 4.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.78 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.78 g of CO₂e: 574.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8275
  • Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

    Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (2 elements).

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h1 → h4 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 56 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 7 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 9 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 7 passed and 2 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9282
  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Segnalati”, “A GROUP COMPANY OF” and “PROUDLY WORKING WITH”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.monzanet.it/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at monzanet.it/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 136 internal links, 18 external

    The homepage links to 136 pages on monzanet.it and 18 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 141 characters

    Your meta description is 141 characters: “Monzanet è il sito ufficiale dell'Autodromo Nazionale Monza, eccellenza italiana dei motorsport, il tempio della veloci…”.

  • Title: 47 characters

    Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Autodromo Nazionale Monza | The Temple of Speed”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.monzanet.it/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.monzanet.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.monzanet.it/autodromo-nazionale-monza, https://www.monzanet.it/safety-security-2 and https://www.monzanet.it/sostenibilita-autodromo-nazionale-monza have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages slow to respond

    https://www.monzanet.it/societa-trasparente, https://www.monzanet.it/richiesta-servizi, https://www.monzanet.it/safety-security-2, https://www.monzanet.it/sostenibilita-autodromo-nazionale-monza and https://www.monzanet.it/accredito-disabili-formula-1 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 67 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    9 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 92100
  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 808 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 808 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “BUY TICKETS”, “Buy Tickets” and “SHOP”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at monzanet.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on monzanet.it, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25