Website review, no card needed

motherscience.com logo

motherscience.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202637 issues · 87 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on motherscience.com, 15 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.2 s2.6 sMay 23Nov 72.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20264.6 s
May 30, 20264.7 s
Jun 6, 20264.8 s
Jun 13, 20264.8 s
Jun 20, 20264.9 s
Jun 27, 20264.9 s
Jul 4, 20264.8 s
Jul 11, 20264.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.6 s
Jul 25, 20263.6 s
Aug 1, 20263.7 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20264.2 s
Aug 22, 20264.6 s
Aug 29, 20264.7 s
Sep 5, 20264.6 s
Sep 12, 20264.5 s
Sep 19, 20264.4 s
Sep 26, 20264.3 s
Oct 3, 20264.4 s
Oct 10, 20264.7 s
Oct 17, 20264.3 s
Oct 24, 20263.8 s
Oct 31, 20263.3 s
Nov 7, 20262.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
227 ms98 msMay 23Nov 7121 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026113 ms
May 30, 2026113 ms
Jun 6, 2026118 ms
Jun 13, 2026126 ms
Jun 20, 2026135 ms
Jun 27, 2026139 ms
Jul 4, 2026145 ms
Jul 11, 2026152 ms
Jul 18, 2026160 ms
Jul 25, 2026170 ms
Aug 1, 2026182 ms
Aug 8, 2026183 ms
Aug 15, 2026197 ms
Aug 22, 2026212 ms
Aug 29, 2026204 ms
Sep 5, 2026208 ms
Sep 12, 2026196 ms
Sep 19, 2026187 ms
Sep 26, 2026187 ms
Oct 3, 2026167 ms
Oct 10, 2026163 ms
Oct 17, 2026153 ms
Oct 24, 2026124 ms
Oct 31, 2026113 ms
Nov 7, 2026121 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of motherscience.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. motherscience.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  2. motherscience.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  3. motherscience.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  4. motherscience.com at 6.1 s6.1 s
  5. motherscience.com at 7.6 s7.6 s
  6. motherscience.com at 9.1 s9.1 s
  7. motherscience.com at 10.7 s10.7 s
  8. motherscience.com at 12.2 s12.2 s

Speed

8 to fix61
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.0 s · 1.1 MB

    34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 808 KiB

    About 808 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 4.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 61

    61/100

    Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (joinground.com, poweredbyhue.app and posthog.com and others), adding 1.5 MB and 713 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    650 ms

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.

  • poweredbyhue.app adds 128 ms

    128 ms

    poweredbyhue.app costs a phone 128 ms of main-thread work and 536 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,523 HTML elements

    The page has 1,523 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 28 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 28 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 24 KiB

    About 24 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 113 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    51 KiB

    2 images could be 51 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    14 KiB

    14 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 19 ms

    19 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 19 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.8 s

    10.8 s

    Your largest element takes 10.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 12.6 s

    12.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.6 s

    17.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 215 ms

    215 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 215 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 114 ms

    114 ms

    Real visitors wait 114 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 482 ms

    482 ms

    Real visitors wait 482 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 33% faster for real visitors

    -33%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 15.4 MB in 351 requests

    15.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 15.4 MB in 351 requests on a phone: media 9.9 MB (1), images 2.1 MB (52) and scripts 1.9 MB (89). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 4.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.36 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.36 g of CO₂e: 523.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 9086
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 6 tap targets too small

    6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text (1 element)

    <svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 21 images without alt text

    21 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 11 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9294
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 73 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 73 pages on motherscience.com and 11 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 132 characters

    Your meta description is 132 characters: “Discover Mother Science, a revolutionary biotech skincare brand with a clinically proven serum for hyperpigmentation an…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “MALASSEZIN:TODAY’S DISCOVERY.TOMORROW’S GOLD STANDARD.”.

  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Mother Science: Breakthrough Clinical Skincare”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://motherscience.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://motherscience.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,350 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://motherscience.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://motherscience.com/products/molecular-genesis-barrier-repair-moisturizer-15ml, https://motherscience.com/collections/shop-all and https://motherscience.com/pages/referrals have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://motherscience.com/products/molecular-genesis-barrier-repair-moisturizer-15ml and https://motherscience.com/pages/referrals have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 9270
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://api.datasteam.io/v1/C/pixel/490E20EA894F?v=33713209-4844-433c-83d7-8fe12f2ac64c&se=fc54da04-28e8-4dd0-9c87-d6cbaf2d4fdd&p=ee001351-452d-491b-a0de-dc9ee76fa01c&l=pageload&d=eyJ2IjoiMzM3MTMyMDkt.

  • 11 small tap targets

    11 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix93
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 637 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 637 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Apply” and “SHOP THE DUO”.

  • 19 calls to action

    The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Apply”, “SHOP THE DUO” and “SUBSCRIBE”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and PostHog.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 37 cookies set on arrival

    37

    Opening the homepage sets 37 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 57 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 57 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at motherscience.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 13 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Awin Affiliate Marketing · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Triplewhale · Attentive · Okendo · Ground · A077cfc7 Opensend · Freegifts · shareasale.com · luckyorange.com · attn.tv · cloudfront.net · bogos.io

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | PostHog
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
Los Angeles

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on motherscience.com, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25