Website review, no card needed
motherscience.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202637 issues · 87 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on motherscience.com, 15 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
84B- #19,770 of 108,894 reviewed websitesbeats 77%
- #12,885 of 61,770 online storesbeats 73%
- #12,515 of 56,366 Shopify storesbeats 71%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 121 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.5 s
3.0 s
4.6 s
6.1 s
7.6 s
9.1 s
10.7 s
12.2 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.0 s · 1.1 MB34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 808 KiBAbout 808 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 4.4 s
A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 61
61/100Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (joinground.com, poweredbyhue.app and posthog.com and others), adding 1.5 MB and 713 ms of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
650 ms11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.
poweredbyhue.app adds 128 ms
128 mspoweredbyhue.app costs a phone 128 ms of main-thread work and 536 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,523 HTML elements
The page has 1,523 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 28 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 28 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 24 KiBAbout 24 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 113 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
51 KiB2 images could be 51 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Duplicated JavaScript
14 KiB14 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 19 ms
19 msYour server sent the HTML in 19 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.8 s
10.8 sYour largest element takes 10.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 12.6 s
12.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 17.6 s
17.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 215 ms
215 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 215 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 114 ms
114 msReal visitors wait 114 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 482 ms
482 msReal visitors wait 482 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 33% faster for real visitors
-33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 15.4 MB in 351 requests
15.4 MBYour homepage downloads 15.4 MB in 351 requests on a phone: media 9.9 MB (1), images 2.1 MB (52) and scripts 1.9 MB (89). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 4.4 g of CO₂ per visit
4.36 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.36 g of CO₂e: 523.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
<svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text (1 element)
<svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
21 images without alt text
21 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 11 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
73 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 73 pages on motherscience.com and 11 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 132 characters
Your meta description is 132 characters: “Discover Mother Science, a revolutionary biotech skincare brand with a clinically proven serum for hyperpigmentation an…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “MALASSEZIN:TODAY’S DISCOVERY.TOMORROW’S GOLD STANDARD.”.
Title: 46 characters
Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Mother Science: Breakthrough Clinical Skincare”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://motherscience.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://motherscience.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,350 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://motherscience.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
https://motherscience.com/products/molecular-genesis-barrier-repair-moisturizer-15ml, https://motherscience.com/collections/shop-all and https://motherscience.com/pages/referrals have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://motherscience.com/products/molecular-genesis-barrier-repair-moisturizer-15ml and https://motherscience.com/pages/referrals have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://api.datasteam.io/v1/C/pixel/490E20EA894F?v=33713209-4844-433c-83d7-8fe12f2ac64c&se=fc54da04-28e8-4dd0-9c87-d6cbaf2d4fdd&p=ee001351-452d-491b-a0de-dc9ee76fa01c&l=pageload&d=eyJ2IjoiMzM3MTMyMDkt.
11 small tap targets
11 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
3 distorted images
3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 637 words of copy
The homepage carries about 637 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Apply” and “SHOP THE DUO”.
19 calls to action
The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Apply”, “SHOP THE DUO” and “SUBSCRIBE”.
1 short form
A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and PostHog.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
37 cookies set on arrival
37Opening the homepage sets 37 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
57 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 57 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at motherscience.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 13 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Awin Affiliate Marketing · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Triplewhale · Attentive · Okendo · Ground · A077cfc7 Opensend · Freegifts · shareasale.com · luckyorange.com · attn.tv · cloudfront.net · bogos.io
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | PostHog
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Los Angeles
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on motherscience.com, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.