Website review, no card needed
mphasis.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202650 issues · 92 checks
This review found 50 issues worth fixing on mphasis.com, 20 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 172 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 173 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 176 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.6 s
2.3 s
3.1 s
3.9 s
4.7 s
5.4 s
6.2 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
16.2 s · 3.1 MBAbout 3.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 16.2 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.3 s · 3.7 MB66 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.7 MB).
Reduce unused CSS
2.1 s · 440 KiBAbout 440 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 2.1 s
2.1 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 2.1 s of main-thread work and 1.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
2.0 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.
Mobile performance score: 26
26/100Your mobile performance score is 26. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.6 s
A phone's processor spends 7.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookie-Script.com and Adobe Tag Manager and others), adding 1.9 MB and 3.1 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
800 ms · 1.4 MB16 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 965 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Cookie-Script.com adds 667 ms
667 msCookie-Script.com costs a phone 667 ms of main-thread work and 34 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
450 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
350 ms · 88 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 88 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 39 KiB39 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Document request latency
127 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 27 ms
27 msYour server sent the HTML in 27 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.9 s
4.9 sReal visitors wait 4.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 54.4 s
54.4 sYour largest element takes 54.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “…”.
Speed Index: 18.9 s
18.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 55.4 s
55.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 55.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.4 s
6.4 sThe first text or image appears after 6.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 3.5 s
3.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 822 ms
822 msReal visitors wait 822 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 172 ms to 176 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.5 s to 4.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 174 ms
174 msReal visitors wait 174 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 17.1 MB in 160 requests
17.1 MBYour homepage downloads 17.1 MB in 160 requests on a phone: scripts 6.2 MB (31), media 5.5 MB (4) and images 4.2 MB (60). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
21 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example new-version-tria-logo.png.thumb.468.468.png at 1,280 px wide, shown at 340 px. Resized copies would save about 21 KiB.
2 images in older formats
2 images (195 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (59 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.9 g of CO₂ per visit
4.86 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.86 g of CO₂e: 583.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (43 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 43 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (4 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (69 characters)
Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Mphasis: IT Consulting & Applied Technology Services | Tech Solutions”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (167 characters)
Your meta description is 167 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
8 links crawlers can't follow
8 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
235 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 235 pages on mphasis.com and 18 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “INTRODUCING MPHASIS NEOIPTM”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mphasis.com/home.html.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mphasis.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,514 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.mphasis.com/llms.txt (25 KiB, 102 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.mphasis.com/fr/home.html and https://www.mphasis.com/de/home.html all use the title “Applied Technology Services and Solutions | Digital Transformation | …”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.mphasis.com/home/esg.html and https://www.mphasis.com/home/industries/banking-capitalmarkets.html have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.mphasis.com/fr/home.html and https://www.mphasis.com/de/home.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.mphasis.com/home/esg.html, whose canonical is https://www.mphasis.com/home/privacy.html. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.mphasis.com/home/culture.html, https://www.mphasis.com/de/home.html and https://www.mphasis.com/home/industries/banking-capitalmarkets.html have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 101 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 14 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,191 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,191 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Whistleblower Channel Contact” and “Contact Us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
26 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mphasis.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Azure
Company
- Founded
- 2000
- Headquarters
- Bengaluru
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 50 issues on mphasis.com, including 23 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.