Website review, no card needed

mtsa.edu logo

mtsa.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202636 issues · 85 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on mtsa.edu, 11 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.3 sJun 6Oct 171.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
107 ms55 msJun 13Oct 17101 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 13, 202662 ms
Jun 20, 202662 ms
Jun 27, 202661 ms
Jul 4, 202662 ms
Jul 11, 202666 ms
Jul 18, 202669 ms
Jul 25, 202670 ms
Aug 1, 202671 ms
Aug 8, 202674 ms
Aug 22, 202686 ms
Aug 29, 202696 ms
Sep 5, 202697 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 202695 ms
Sep 26, 202692 ms
Oct 3, 202697 ms
Oct 10, 2026101 ms
Oct 17, 2026101 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mtsa.edu (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mtsa.edu at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. mtsa.edu at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. mtsa.edu at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. mtsa.edu at 3.3 s3.3 s
  5. mtsa.edu at 4.2 s4.2 s
  6. mtsa.edu at 5.0 s5.0 s
  7. mtsa.edu at 5.8 s5.8 s
  8. mtsa.edu at 6.7 s6.7 s

Speed

11 to fix30
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.3 s

    94 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.3 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 536 KiB

    About 536 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 30

    30/100

    Your mobile performance score is 30 (desktop: 67). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and docsbot.ai and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 905 ms

    905 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 905 ms of main-thread work and 505 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 887 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 457 ms

    457 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 457 ms of main-thread work and 223 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    359 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (359 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 53 KiB

    About 53 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2,261 HTML elements

    The page has 2,261 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 67 but mobile only 30. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.5 s

    18.5 s

    Your largest element takes 18.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Stand Out As A Full Scope CRNA. Welcome To The Nation’s Onl…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.1 s

    24.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.6 s

    14.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 63% slower for real visitors

    +63%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 62 ms to 101 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 956 ms

    956 ms

    Real visitors wait 956 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 100 ms

    100 ms

    Real visitors wait 100 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 15.8 MB in 165 requests

    15.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 15.8 MB in 165 requests on a phone: media 10.5 MB (2), images 3.5 MB (10) and scripts 1.3 MB (37). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    30 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example home-intro.png at 390 px wide, shown at 118 px. Resized copies would save about 30 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (171 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (171 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.46 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.46 g of CO₂e: 535.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 9393
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 4 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 124 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 124 pages on mtsa.edu and 9 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 150 characters

    Your meta description is 150 characters: “MTSA is ranked #5 in the nation, and is the only standalone CRNA institution in the country. Explore top-ranked CRNA pr…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Stand Out As A Full Scope CRNA.”.

  • Title: 51 characters

    Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “Top 5 CRNA Program | Nurse Anesthesia School | MTSA”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.mtsa.edu/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mtsa.edu/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.mtsa.edu/llms.txt (5 KiB, 56 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.mtsa.edu/events has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.mtsa.edu/contact and https://www.mtsa.edu/become-a-crna have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 52 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 9 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix83
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Only about 114 words

    The homepage has only about 114 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “APPLY NOW”.

  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Apply” and “Apply Now”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mtsa.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Company

Employees
37

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on mtsa.edu, including 19 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25