Website review, no card needed

mtt.ru logo

mtt.ru website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202636 issues · 88 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on mtt.ru, 9 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s3.0 sMay 16Oct 313.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.3 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.2 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Oct 24, 20263.3 s
Oct 31, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
209 ms147 msMay 16Oct 31154 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026189 ms
May 23, 2026196 ms
May 30, 2026197 ms
Jun 6, 2026202 ms
Jun 13, 2026197 ms
Jun 20, 2026188 ms
Jun 27, 2026185 ms
Jul 4, 2026182 ms
Jul 11, 2026171 ms
Jul 18, 2026170 ms
Jul 25, 2026168 ms
Aug 1, 2026167 ms
Aug 8, 2026173 ms
Aug 15, 2026174 ms
Aug 22, 2026179 ms
Aug 29, 2026170 ms
Sep 5, 2026172 ms
Sep 12, 2026165 ms
Sep 19, 2026157 ms
Sep 26, 2026158 ms
Oct 3, 2026157 ms
Oct 10, 2026162 ms
Oct 17, 2026160 ms
Oct 24, 2026160 ms
Oct 31, 2026154 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mtt.ru (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mtt.ru at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. mtt.ru at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. mtt.ru at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. mtt.ru at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. mtt.ru at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. mtt.ru at 3.6 s3.6 s
  7. mtt.ru at 4.2 s4.2 s
  8. mtt.ru at 4.8 s4.8 s

Speed

10 to fix59
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.7 s · 769 KiB

    About 769 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • 4,061 HTML elements

    The page has 4,061 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    880 ms · 112 KiB

    About 112 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 880 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 77 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (77 KiB).

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Yandex Metrica and mail.ru and others), adding 967 KiB and 606 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 413 ms

    413 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 413 ms of main-thread work and 742 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 51 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 51 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 165 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    10 KiB

    1 image could be 10 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 206 ms

    206 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 206 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.9 s

    10.9 s

    Your largest element takes 10.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “СПЕЦИАЛЬНОЕ ПРЕДЛОЖЕНИЕ Надежная телефония и 40+ инструмент…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 953 ms

    953 ms

    Real visitors wait 953 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 348 ms

    348 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 348 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 27 images without width and height

    27 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 147 ms

    147 ms

    Real visitors wait 147 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 189 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.1 MB in 54 requests

    2.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 54 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (18), other files 379 KiB (14) and stylesheets 127 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.58 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.58 g of CO₂e: 69.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 7691
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (146 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 146 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 45 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9287
  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 16 links crawlers can't follow

    16 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 336 internal links, 50 external

    The homepage links to 336 pages on mtt.ru and 50 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 151 characters

    Your meta description is 151 characters: “МТТ — оператор мультисервисной сети связи, предоставляющий широкий спектр телекоммуникационных услуг операторам связи, …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “«АО Межрегиональный ТранзитТелеком»”.

  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Оператор связи МТТ | АО «Межрегиональный ТранзитТелеком»”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mtt.ru/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.mtt.ru/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.

Other pages

100
  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://www.mtt.ru/promotions/vats-za-1-rubl, https://www.mtt.ru/promotions and https://www.mtt.ru/about/compliance have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 5 pages slow to respond

    https://www.mtt.ru/services, https://www.mtt.ru/integratsii, https://www.mtt.ru/tariffs, https://www.mtt.ru/about/press-center and https://www.mtt.ru/about/reviews took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 152 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7797
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    83 of 97 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 15 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Only about 129 words

    The homepage has only about 129 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Телефония для Call-центра”, “Виртуальный оператор call-центра” and “Суфлирование для Call‑центра”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Yandex Metrica (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mtt.ru, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Timeweb

Hiring

Hiring
2 open roles
Job board
careers page

Company

Founded
1994
Headquarters
Moscow

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on mtt.ru, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25