Website review, no card needed

mtva.hu logo

mtva.hu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202641 issues · 82 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on mtva.hu, 18 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 242.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
126 ms106 msMay 9Oct 24114 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026108 ms
May 16, 2026115 ms
May 23, 2026113 ms
May 30, 2026114 ms
Jun 6, 2026119 ms
Jun 13, 2026119 ms
Jun 20, 2026118 ms
Jun 27, 2026116 ms
Jul 4, 2026115 ms
Jul 11, 2026112 ms
Jul 18, 2026111 ms
Jul 25, 2026111 ms
Aug 1, 2026110 ms
Aug 8, 2026121 ms
Aug 15, 2026124 ms
Aug 22, 2026121 ms
Aug 29, 2026121 ms
Sep 5, 2026116 ms
Sep 12, 2026117 ms
Sep 19, 2026121 ms
Sep 26, 2026121 ms
Oct 3, 2026115 ms
Oct 10, 2026112 ms
Oct 17, 2026112 ms
Oct 24, 2026114 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mtva.hu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mtva.hu at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. mtva.hu at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. mtva.hu at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. mtva.hu at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. mtva.hu at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. mtva.hu at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. mtva.hu at 4.3 s4.3 s
  8. mtva.hu at 4.9 s4.9 s

Speed

10 to fix29
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.7 s

    77 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.7 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    3.8 s · 842 KiB

    4 images could be 842 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.9 s · 413 KiB

    86 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (413 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 s · 454 KiB

    About 454 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 29

    29/100

    Your mobile performance score is 29. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 146 KiB

    About 146 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google/Doubleclick Ads and publisher1st.com and others), adding 868 KiB and 502 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    500 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 500 ms).

  • 2,752 HTML elements

    The page has 2,752 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 224 ms

    224 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 224 ms of main-thread work and 297 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    160 ms · 15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 174 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    19 KiB

    19 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    18 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 597 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 255 ms

    255 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 255 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.31

    0.31

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.31 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.0 s

    14.0 s

    Your largest element takes 14.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Kunigunda_1920x480px”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.987

    0.987

    The layout shifts by 0.987 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.5 s

    14.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.1 s

    8.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 245 ms

    245 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 245 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 108 ms to 114 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Real visitors wait 111 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 377 ms

    377 ms

    Real visitors wait 377 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix67
  • Page weight: 2.4 MB in 107 requests

    2.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB in 107 requests on a phone: images 1.0 MB (12), scripts 959 KiB (49) and stylesheets 233 KiB (38). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.67 g of CO₂e: 80.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8088
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (11 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500% (1 element)

    Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500%: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8375
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (7 characters)

    Your title is only 7 characters: “mtva.hu”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 370 H1 headlines

    There are 370 <h1> headlines (“Feladataink”, “Feladataink” and “Nemzeti Fotótár”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 778 internal links, 22 external

    The homepage links to 778 pages on mtva.hu and 22 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://mtva.hu/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://mtva.hu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://mtva.hu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (9,399 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://mtva.hu/menedzsment/vezetoseg, https://mtva.hu/sajtokapcsolat/kozlemenyeink, https://mtva.hu/sajtokapcsolat/hireink and https://mtva.hu/kozonsegszolgalat/gyakori-kerdesek have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://mtva.hu/torvenyi-hatter/felugyeleti-szerv and https://mtva.hu/torvenyi-hatter/mediatanacs use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://mtva.hu/menedzsment/felso-vezetoseg and https://mtva.hu/menedzsment/vezetoseg have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://mtva.hu/menedzsment/vezetoseg has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 198 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9686
  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Identifier 'eraseCookie' has already been declared”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    666 of 740 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 9,335 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 9,335 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Egyetlen szó-val ért véget A Dal 2021”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mtva.hu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2018.

Stack

Hosting
As Mtva

Company

Founded
2011
Headquarters
Budapest

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on mtva.hu, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25