Website review, no card needed
mudo.com.tr website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202658 issues · 99 checks
This review found 58 issues worth fixing on mudo.com.tr, 18 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 309 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 298 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 298 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 342 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 373 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 396 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 406 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 405 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 402 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 401 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 389 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 375 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 364 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 353 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 352 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 364 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 379 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 394 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 415 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 425 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 429 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 432 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 426 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 420 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.2 s
2.5 s
3.7 s
4.9 s
6.2 s
7.4 s
8.6 s
9.9 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.8 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 669 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 33
33/100Your mobile performance score is 33 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8,857 HTML elements
The page has 8,857 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 7.8 s
A phone's processor spends 7.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Insider and akinoncloud.com and others), adding 2.5 MB and 2.9 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
986 KiBAbout 986 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Insider adds 833 ms
833 msInsider costs a phone 833 ms of main-thread work and 713 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 74 KiBAbout 74 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 590 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
akinoncloud.com adds 405 ms
405 msakinoncloud.com costs a phone 405 ms of main-thread work and 384 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
423 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (423 KiB).
palmate.ai adds 306 ms
306 mspalmate.ai costs a phone 306 ms of main-thread work and 719 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
efilli.com adds 309 ms
309 msefilli.com costs a phone 309 ms of main-thread work and 69 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
300 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).
Duplicated JavaScript
189 KiB189 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Improve image delivery
12 KiB1 image could be 12 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 58 but mobile only 33. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 503 ms
503 msReal visitors wait 503 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 23.9 s
23.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s
1.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 9.3 s
9.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sThe first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s
4.2 sYour largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “GİYİM”.
Real-user CLS: 0.18
0.18For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 39% slower for real visitors
+39%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 309 ms to 420 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.22
0.22The layout shifts by 0.22 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 668 ms
668 msReal visitors wait 668 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.4 MB in 144 requests
3.4 MBYour homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 144 requests on a phone: scripts 2.0 MB (38), images 857 KiB (30) and fonts 278 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
0.97 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.97 g of CO₂e: 116.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
47 tap targets too small
47 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (7 elements)
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (2 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 16 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
89 links crawlers can't follow
89 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
6 H1 headlines
There are 6 <h1> headlines (“1. Hangi Kişisel Verileriniz İşlenmektedir?”, “2. Kişisel Verileriniz Kimlere ve Hangi Amaçlarla…” and “3. Kişisel Verileriniz Ne Kadar Süre ile Saklanır?”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
227 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 227 pages on mudo.com.tr and 13 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 143 characters
Your meta description is 143 characters: “Kadın ve erkek giyimde şıklığı, ev - bahçe ürünlerinde kaliteyi yakalayacağınız ürünler ve tamamlayıcı aksesuarlar Mudo…”.
Title: 43 characters
Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Mudo: Online Alışverişin İlham Veren Rotası”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mudo.com.tr/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mudo.com.tr/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.mudo.com.tr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (5,189 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages share 2 titles
https://www.mudo.com.tr/giyim and https://www.mudo.com.tr/kadin-giyim all use the title “Kadın Giyim, Kadın Giyim Modelleri ve Fiyatları | Mudo”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
5 pages without a meta description
https://www.mudo.com.tr/mudo-card, https://www.mudo.com.tr/mudo-market-urunleri, https://www.mudo.com.tr/sezon-indirimi, https://www.mudo.com.tr/pamuklu-urunler-koleksiyon and https://www.mudo.com.tr/giyim-jean have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.mudo.com.tr/giyim and https://www.mudo.com.tr/kadin-giyim use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.mudo.com.tr/giyim, whose canonical is https://www.mudo.com.tr/kadin-giyim. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.mudo.com.tr/giyim, https://www.mudo.com.tr/pamuklu-urunler-koleksiyon and https://www.mudo.com.tr/kadin-giyim have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 174 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
79 small tap targets
79 of 136 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Manifest: Line: 1, column: 1, Syntax error.”.
Pasting is blocked
A form field blocks pasting, which frustrates password managers and people on phones.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 328 words of copy
The homepage carries about 328 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (0 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
16 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mudo.com.tr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1964
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 58 issues on mudo.com.tr, including 25 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.