Website review, no card needed

mudo.com.tr logo

mudo.com.tr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202658 issues · 99 checks

This review found 58 issues worth fixing on mudo.com.tr, 18 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.4 sMay 9Oct 242.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
452 ms278 msMay 9Oct 24420 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026309 ms
May 16, 2026298 ms
May 23, 2026298 ms
May 30, 2026313 ms
Jun 6, 2026342 ms
Jun 13, 2026373 ms
Jun 20, 2026396 ms
Jun 27, 2026406 ms
Jul 4, 2026405 ms
Jul 11, 2026402 ms
Jul 18, 2026401 ms
Jul 25, 2026389 ms
Aug 1, 2026375 ms
Aug 8, 2026364 ms
Aug 15, 2026353 ms
Aug 22, 2026352 ms
Aug 29, 2026364 ms
Sep 5, 2026379 ms
Sep 12, 2026394 ms
Sep 19, 2026415 ms
Sep 26, 2026425 ms
Oct 3, 2026429 ms
Oct 10, 2026432 ms
Oct 17, 2026426 ms
Oct 24, 2026420 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mudo.com.tr (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mudo.com.tr at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. mudo.com.tr at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. mudo.com.tr at 3.7 s3.7 s
  4. mudo.com.tr at 4.9 s4.9 s
  5. mudo.com.tr at 6.2 s6.2 s
  6. mudo.com.tr at 7.4 s7.4 s
  7. mudo.com.tr at 8.6 s8.6 s
  8. mudo.com.tr at 9.9 s9.9 s

Speed

15 to fix33
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.8 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 669 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 33

    33/100

    Your mobile performance score is 33 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8,857 HTML elements

    The page has 8,857 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 7.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Insider and akinoncloud.com and others), adding 2.5 MB and 2.9 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    986 KiB

    About 986 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Insider adds 833 ms

    833 ms

    Insider costs a phone 833 ms of main-thread work and 713 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 74 KiB

    About 74 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 590 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • akinoncloud.com adds 405 ms

    405 ms

    akinoncloud.com costs a phone 405 ms of main-thread work and 384 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    423 KiB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (423 KiB).

  • palmate.ai adds 306 ms

    306 ms

    palmate.ai costs a phone 306 ms of main-thread work and 719 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • efilli.com adds 309 ms

    309 ms

    efilli.com costs a phone 309 ms of main-thread work and 69 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    300 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    189 KiB

    189 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Improve image delivery

    12 KiB

    1 image could be 12 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 58 but mobile only 33. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 503 ms

    503 ms

    Real visitors wait 503 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.9 s

    23.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Your largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “GİYİM”.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.18

    0.18

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 39% slower for real visitors

    +39%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 309 ms to 420 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.22

    0.22

    The layout shifts by 0.22 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 668 ms

    668 ms

    Real visitors wait 668 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.4 MB in 144 requests

    3.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 144 requests on a phone: scripts 2.0 MB (38), images 857 KiB (30) and fonts 278 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.97 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.97 g of CO₂e: 116.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

16 to fixGoogle 7983
  • Images must have alternative text (1 element)

    Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 47 tap targets too small

    47 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (7 elements)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (2 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 16 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8590
  • 89 links crawlers can't follow

    89 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“1. Hangi Kişisel Verileriniz İşlenmektedir?”, “2. Kişisel Verileriniz Kimlere ve Hangi Amaçlarla…” and “3. Kişisel Verileriniz Ne Kadar Süre ile Saklanır?”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 227 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 227 pages on mudo.com.tr and 13 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 143 characters

    Your meta description is 143 characters: “Kadın ve erkek giyimde şıklığı, ev - bahçe ürünlerinde kaliteyi yakalayacağınız ürünler ve tamamlayıcı aksesuarlar Mudo…”.

  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Mudo: Online Alışverişin İlham Veren Rotası”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.mudo.com.tr/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mudo.com.tr/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.mudo.com.tr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (5,189 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix76
  • 6 pages share 2 titles

    https://www.mudo.com.tr/giyim and https://www.mudo.com.tr/kadin-giyim all use the title “Kadın Giyim, Kadın Giyim Modelleri ve Fiyatları | Mudo”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.mudo.com.tr/mudo-card, https://www.mudo.com.tr/mudo-market-urunleri, https://www.mudo.com.tr/sezon-indirimi, https://www.mudo.com.tr/pamuklu-urunler-koleksiyon and https://www.mudo.com.tr/giyim-jean have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.mudo.com.tr/giyim and https://www.mudo.com.tr/kadin-giyim use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.mudo.com.tr/giyim, whose canonical is https://www.mudo.com.tr/kadin-giyim. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.mudo.com.tr/giyim, https://www.mudo.com.tr/pamuklu-urunler-koleksiyon and https://www.mudo.com.tr/kadin-giyim have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 174 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 8885
  • 79 small tap targets

    79 of 136 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Manifest: Line: 1, column: 1, Syntax error.”.

  • Pasting is blocked

    A form field blocks pasting, which frustrates password managers and people on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 328 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 328 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (0 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mudo.com.tr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
1964

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 58 issues on mudo.com.tr, including 25 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25