Website review, no card needed
mxm.com.co website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202653 issues · 75 checks
This review found 53 issues worth fixing on mxm.com.co, 26 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
49FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 177 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 197 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
33.8 s · 8.5 MB110 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8.5 MB).
Improve image delivery
32.6 s · 9.2 MB31 images could be 9.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 32.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
8.1 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 8.1 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.0 s · 971 KiBAbout 971 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.0 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 11
11/100Your mobile performance score is 11. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google Analytics and others), adding 14.9 MB and 638 ms of main-thread time.
Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 0 ms
0 msOther Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 14.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 473 ms
473 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 473 ms of main-thread work and 501 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 68 KiBAbout 68 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,661 HTML elements
The page has 2,661 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 253 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 51 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 51 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 1.73
1.73For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.73 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.549
1.549The layout shifts by 1.549 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 9.5 s
9.5 sThe first text or image appears after 9.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 60.5 s
60.5 sYour largest element takes 60.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 17.7 s
17.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 60.6 s
60.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 60.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 782 ms
782 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 782 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
28 images without width and height
28 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 177 ms to 197 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 197 ms
197 msReal visitors wait 197 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 638 ms
638 msReal visitors wait 638 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 16.9 MB in 277 requests
16.9 MBYour homepage downloads 16.9 MB in 277 requests on a phone: images 14.1 MB (65), scripts 1.7 MB (27) and fonts 700 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
21 images far larger than shown
6.6 MB21 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 67f93a533e77024f29dc5c304c1241e7.jpg at 2,935 px wide, shown at 270 px. Resized copies would save about 6.6 MB.
7 images over 500 KB
7 images weigh 5.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
40 images in older formats
40 images (12.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
28 images below the first screen load straight away
28 images further down the page (6.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.8 g of CO₂ per visit
4.79 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.79 g of CO₂e: 574.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (52 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 52 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (3 elements)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (130 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 130 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (3 characters)
Your title is only 3 characters: “...”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://mxm.com.co/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
5 links crawlers can't follow
5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
1 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 443 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://mxm.com.co/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 (Unauthorized)”.
22 distorted images
22 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 443 words of copy
The homepage carries about 443 words of visible text.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mxm.com.co, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 53 issues on mxm.com.co, including 23 speed issues, 9 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.