Website review, no card needed
nailsfactory.es website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202646 issues · 86 checks
This review found 46 issues worth fixing on nailsfactory.es, 23 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
54FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 178 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 178 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 253 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.6 s
2.4 s
3.3 s
4.1 s
4.9 s
5.7 s
6.5 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
7.0 s · 884 KiBAbout 884 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
4.6 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.6 s.
Improve image delivery
3.3 s · 769 KiB5 images could be 769 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.3 s · 529 KiB15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (529 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 8
8/100Your mobile performance score is 8 (desktop: 27). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.0 s
A phone's processor spends 5.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google CDN and others), adding 2.0 MB and 2.6 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 953 ms
953 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 953 ms of main-thread work and 521 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 525 ms
525 msFacebook costs a phone 525 ms of main-thread work and 320 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 537 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 68 KiBAbout 68 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 423 ms
423 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 423 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Cookiebot adds 382 ms
382 msCookiebot costs a phone 382 ms of main-thread work and 41 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
200 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 24 KiB24 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.3 s
4.3 sReal visitors wait 4.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.53
0.53For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.53 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 27.2 s
27.2 sYour largest element takes 27.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 27.8 s
27.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.3 s
5.3 sThe first text or image appears after 5.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.7 s
10.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.567
0.567The layout shifts by 0.567 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s
1.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 273 ms
273 msReal visitors wait 273 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 42% slower for real visitors
+42%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 178 ms to 253 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.7 MB in 112 requests
4.7 MBYour homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 112 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (56), images 1.4 MB (21) and fonts 634 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (87 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (76 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.34 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.34 g of CO₂e: 161.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
5 images without alt text
5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Meta description is long (247 characters)
Your meta description is 247 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
66 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 66 pages on nailsfactory.es and 9 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Nails Factory - Uñas, Manicura y Belleza | Franquicia Líder”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.nailsfactory.es/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.nailsfactory.es/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.nailsfactory.es/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (442 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.nailsfactory.es/social-room has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.nailsfactory.es/social-room and https://www.nailsfactory.es/servicios have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.nailsfactory.es/social-room has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.nailsfactory.es/servicios-para-tus-unas-en-nails-factory/geils/thermic-geils, https://www.nailsfactory.es/servicios-para-tus-unas-en-nails-factory/geils/geils-cat-eye and https://www.nailsfactory.es/servicios-para-tus-unas-en-nails-factory/geils/geils-macaron took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 33 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Scrolls sideways on phones
On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 360 words of copy
The homepage carries about 360 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nailsfactory.es, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Axarnet
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 46 issues on nailsfactory.es, including 27 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.