Website review, no card needed
napapijri.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202638 issues · 83 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on napapijri.com, 12 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 49. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77C- #53,837 of 95,839 reviewed websitesbeats 39%
- #33,381 of 51,788 online storesbeats 30%
- #31,649 of 46,888 Shopify storesbeats 28%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 216 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 213 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 212 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 257 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 216 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 49
49/100Your mobile performance score is 49. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,427 HTML elements
The page has 3,427 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused JavaScript
900 ms · 713 KiBAbout 713 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
950 ms · 413 KiB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (413 KiB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optimizely and Optanon and others), adding 1.7 MB and 985 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 491 KiB10 images could be 491 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 535 ms
535 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 535 ms of main-thread work and 360 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 404 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 3.9 s
A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Render-blocking requests
350 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.
sierra.chat adds 60 ms
60 mssierra.chat costs a phone 60 ms of main-thread work and 711 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
101 KiBAbout 101 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 14 ms
14 msYour server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.9 s
12.9 sYour largest element takes 12.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “MADE FOR EVERY JOURNEY: JACKETS”.
Time to Interactive: 16.2 s
16.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.9 s
6.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 628 ms
628 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 628 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 216 ms to 216 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 179 ms
179 msReal visitors wait 179 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 589 ms
589 msReal visitors wait 589 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.6 MB in 315 requests
4.6 MBYour homepage downloads 4.6 MB in 315 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (126), images 1.5 MB (28) and other files 824 KiB (110). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.31 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.31 g of CO₂e: 157.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
4 images without alt text
4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“MADE FOR EVERY JOURNEY: JACKETS”, “WARM LAYERS: SWEATS & KNITS” and “COLD DAYS APPROACHING”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Brand, OnlineStore, WebPage and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 2 is not valid JSON (Unexpected end of JSON input)”.
11 links with vague text
11 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
432 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 432 pages on napapijri.com and 7 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 146 characters
Your meta description is 146 characters: “Discover the Napapijri FW26 collection featuring iconic Rainforest anoraks, winter jackets, fleeces and new season styl…”.
Title: 65 characters
Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Napapijri Official Website | FW26 Jackets, Fleeces and Rainforest”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.napapijri.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,449 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.napapijri.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/pages/size-chart, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/pages/select-your-location, https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/pages/wishlist and https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/pages/faq have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/products/bering-duffle-bag-48-lt-np0a4ggmn7c and https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/products/bering-duffle-bag-48-lt-np0a4ggmg4c use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
7 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 7 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/products/skidoo-cotton-anorak-jacket-np0a8b2twt3, whose canonical is https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/products/skidoo-cotton-anorak-jacket-np0a8b2tn7c. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
8 pages without an H1
https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/pages/wishlist, https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/products/skidoo-cotton-anorak-jacket-np0a8b2twt3, https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/products/archive-full-zip-fleece-np0a8apen5e, https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/products/rainforest-next-summer-anorak-jacket-unisex-np0a4fi3g4c, https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/products/rainforest-next-winter-anorak-jacket-np0a4ib9g1f and https://www.napapijri.com/en-gb/products/yupik-full-zip-fleece-hoodie-np0a8azxm5e and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 179 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
14 small tap targets
14 of 43 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “google_tag_manager.rm.208000814(...)(...) is not a function”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 496 words of copy
The homepage carries about 496 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Men” and “Shop Women”.
33 calls to action
The homepage has 33 calls to action, for example “Shop now”, “Shop All Jackets” and “Shop All Tops”.
29 short forms
29 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at napapijri.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Founded
- 1987
- Headquarters
- Stabio
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on napapijri.com, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.