Website review, no card needed

necoindia.com logo

necoindia.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202632 issues · 84 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on necoindia.com, 18 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 242.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
118 ms102 msMay 9Oct 24106 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026114 ms
May 16, 2026115 ms
May 23, 2026116 ms
May 30, 2026116 ms
Jun 6, 2026111 ms
Jun 13, 2026110 ms
Jun 20, 2026107 ms
Jun 27, 2026105 ms
Jul 4, 2026104 ms
Jul 11, 2026104 ms
Jul 18, 2026107 ms
Jul 25, 2026110 ms
Aug 1, 2026111 ms
Aug 8, 2026109 ms
Aug 15, 2026107 ms
Aug 22, 2026107 ms
Aug 29, 2026107 ms
Sep 5, 2026106 ms
Sep 12, 2026107 ms
Sep 19, 2026106 ms
Sep 26, 2026105 ms
Oct 3, 2026108 ms
Oct 10, 2026108 ms
Oct 17, 2026108 ms
Oct 24, 2026106 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of necoindia.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. necoindia.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. necoindia.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. necoindia.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  4. necoindia.com at 5.1 s5.1 s
  5. necoindia.com at 6.4 s6.4 s
  6. necoindia.com at 7.6 s7.6 s
  7. necoindia.com at 8.9 s8.9 s
  8. necoindia.com at 10.2 s10.2 s

Speed

7 to fix55
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    9.1 s · 14.6 MB

    70 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14.6 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    3.1 s · 1.3 MB

    14 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.8 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.8 s.

  • Font display

    3.0 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 3.0 s).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 1.0 MB

    About 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.3 s · 481 KiB

    About 481 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, chatbase.co and Google Fonts and others), adding 238 KiB and 128 ms of main-thread time.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 113 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    77 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 77 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 424 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 283 ms

    283 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 283 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.5 s

    15.5 s

    Your largest element takes 15.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We go beyond manufacturing - we envisage future of the indu…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.2 s

    28.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.7 s

    14.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 18 images without width and height

    18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 114 ms to 106 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 116 ms

    116 ms

    Real visitors wait 116 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.054

    0.054

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.054, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 65 ms

    65 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 65 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 14.9 MB in 77 requests

    14.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.9 MB in 77 requests on a phone: media 9.4 MB (2), images 2.8 MB (52) and scripts 1.6 MB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    banner-02.jpg weighs 617 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    1.1 MB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example banner-02.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.1 MB.

  • 8 images in older formats

    8 images (2.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (258 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.21 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.21 g of CO₂e: 505.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8492
  • 49 text elements with low contrast

    49 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 12 tap targets too small

    12 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (23 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 90 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 6 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9288
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 74 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 74 pages on necoindia.com and 10 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 126 characters

    Your meta description is 126 characters: “Discover Jayaswal Neco – a pioneer in India’s iron and steel castings industry and a trusted name in the manufacturing …”.

  • Title: 32 characters

    Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Jayaswal Neco Industries Limited”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.necoindia.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://necoindia.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.necoindia.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,195 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.necoindia.com/investors/disclosures-under-regulation-46-of-sebi-lodr, https://www.necoindia.com/investors/other-disclosures and https://www.necoindia.com/investors/board-and-committees have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 24 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 636 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 636 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “[email protected]”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at necoindia.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Advika Web Developments Hosting Pvt Ltd

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on necoindia.com, including 16 speed issues and 2 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25