Website review, no card needed
netinsurance.it website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202637 issues · 81 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on netinsurance.it, 11 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 89 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 85 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 81 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 84 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 89 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.2 s
2.3 s
3.5 s
4.7 s
5.8 s
7.0 s
8.2 s
9.4 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.1 s · 2.0 MB46 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.0 MB).
Font display
2.8 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.8 s).
Render-blocking requests
2.4 s17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 83). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
800 ms · 192 KiB3 images could be 192 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 63 KiBAbout 63 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
315 KiBAbout 315 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Google CDN adds 107 ms
107 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 107 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Cloudflare CDN and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 416 KiB and 120 ms of main-thread time.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 124 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
52 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.5 s
A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 114 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 244 ms
244 msYour server sent the HTML in 244 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 12.1 s
12.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.7 s
6.7 sYour largest element takes 6.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (6.3 s).
Time to Interactive: 10.8 s
10.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 10.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sThe first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 89 ms to 89 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 90 ms
90 msReal visitors wait 90 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 18% faster for real visitors
-18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005
0.005The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 37 ms
37 msScripts block the page for only 37 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.5 MB in 56 requests
2.5 MBYour homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 56 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (19), scripts 542 KiB (16) and media 472 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
108 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 27001_SG_SSI_sg05.jpg at 709 px wide, shown at 150 px. Resized copies would save about 108 KiB.
2 images in older formats
2 images (269 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (181 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit
0.71 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.71 g of CO₂e: 85.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (2 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 4 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (13 characters)
Your title is only 13 characters: “Net Insurance”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at http://www.netinsurance.it/sitemap_index.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
70 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 70 pages on netinsurance.it and 11 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 145 characters
Your meta description is 145 characters: “Net Insurance è una compagnia assicurativa che offre soluzioni di protezione dedicate alla persona, alla famiglia e all…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Chi Siamo”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.netinsurance.it/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.netinsurance.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (498 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.netinsurance.it/il-gruppo/net-insurance and https://www.netinsurance.it/il-gruppo/net-insurance-life all use the title “Dati societari – Net Insurance”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.netinsurance.it/parita-di-genere, https://www.netinsurance.it/principi-di-sicurezza-delle-informazioni, https://www.netinsurance.it/comunicazione/sponsorizzazioni and https://www.netinsurance.it/distributore/banche have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.netinsurance.it/sostenibilita and https://www.netinsurance.it/politica-di-impegno use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.netinsurance.it/il-gruppo/net-insurance, whose canonical is https://www.netinsurance.it/il-gruppo/net-insurance/dati-societari. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://www.netinsurance.it/il-gruppo/vision-mission-valori has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
6 pages slow to respond
https://www.netinsurance.it/il-gruppo/net-insurance, https://www.netinsurance.it/il-gruppo/net-insurance-life, https://www.netinsurance.it/parita-di-genere, https://www.netinsurance.it/sostenibilita, https://www.netinsurance.it/comunicazione/sponsorizzazioni and https://www.netinsurance.it/distributore/banche took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
26 of 29 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 437 words of copy
The homepage carries about 437 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 4 email links.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at netinsurance.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on netinsurance.it, including 17 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.