Website review, no card needed

netum.fi logo

netum.fi website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202616 issues · 71 checks

This review found 16 issues worth fixing on netum.fi, 5 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.1 s746 msMay 9Oct 24805 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.0 s
May 16, 2026983 ms
May 23, 2026936 ms
May 30, 2026870 ms
Jun 6, 2026859 ms
Jun 13, 2026859 ms
Jun 20, 2026839 ms
Jun 27, 2026847 ms
Jul 4, 2026883 ms
Jul 11, 2026883 ms
Jul 18, 2026900 ms
Jul 25, 2026919 ms
Aug 1, 2026842 ms
Aug 8, 2026784 ms
Aug 15, 2026800 ms
Aug 22, 2026785 ms
Aug 29, 2026807 ms
Sep 5, 2026868 ms
Sep 12, 2026880 ms
Sep 19, 2026937 ms
Sep 26, 2026903 ms
Oct 3, 2026905 ms
Oct 10, 2026888 ms
Oct 17, 2026829 ms
Oct 24, 2026805 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
117 ms78 msMay 9Oct 24112 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202686 ms
May 16, 202691 ms
May 23, 202694 ms
May 30, 202696 ms
Jun 6, 2026100 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202688 ms
Jun 27, 202683 ms
Jul 4, 202684 ms
Jul 11, 202687 ms
Jul 18, 202682 ms
Jul 25, 202686 ms
Aug 1, 202687 ms
Aug 8, 202689 ms
Aug 15, 202690 ms
Aug 22, 202694 ms
Aug 29, 202697 ms
Sep 5, 202698 ms
Sep 12, 202697 ms
Sep 19, 202698 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 202698 ms
Oct 10, 2026105 ms
Oct 17, 2026107 ms
Oct 24, 2026112 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of netum.fi (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. netum.fi at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. netum.fi at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. netum.fi at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. netum.fi at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. netum.fi at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. netum.fi at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. netum.fi at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. netum.fi at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix80
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    850 ms · 342 KiB

    5 images could be 342 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 850 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 80

    80/100

    Your mobile performance score is 80. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 36 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (36 KiB).

  • 1,892 HTML elements

    The page has 1,892 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 318 KiB and 311 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 43 KiB

    About 43 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    102 KiB

    About 102 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 91 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 477 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 135 ms

    135 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 135 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors

    +24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors wait 0.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 80 ms

    80 ms

    Real visitors wait 80 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors

    -19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 0.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 96 ms

    96 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 96 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (31 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.47 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.47 g of CO₂e: 56.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.7 MB in 53 requests

    1.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.7 MB in 53 requests on a phone: images 864 KiB (19), scripts 434 KiB (15) and fonts 332 KiB (6). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9997
  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 32 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 180 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 180 pages on netum.fi and 5 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 135 characters

    Your meta description is 135 characters: “Ihmislähtöisiä digipalveluja turvallisempaa, älykkäämpää ja kestävämpää yhteiskuntaa varten. Yhdessä kohti parempaa dig…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Yhdessä kohti parempaa digitaalista arkea”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Netum - Yhdessä kohti parempaa digitaalista arkea - Netum”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.netum.fi/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject and WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.netum.fi/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.netum.fi/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (764 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 69 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    8 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 8 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 462 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 462 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks and 4 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at netum.fi, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
React
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Upcloud

Company

Founded
2000
Headquarters
Helsinki

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 16 issues on netum.fi, including 10 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25