Website review, no card needed

nexaas.com logo

nexaas.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202619 issues · 71 checks

This review found 19 issues worth fixing on nexaas.com, 5 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.6 s1.9 sMay 2Oct 172.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.4 s
May 9, 20263.4 s
May 16, 20263.4 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20263.5 s
Jun 6, 20263.5 s
Jun 13, 20263.5 s
Jun 20, 20263.4 s
Jun 27, 20263.7 s
Jul 4, 20263.9 s
Jul 11, 20264.2 s
Jul 18, 20264.3 s
Jul 25, 20264.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.7 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
313 ms237 msMay 2Oct 17246 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026284 ms
May 9, 2026288 ms
May 16, 2026281 ms
May 23, 2026253 ms
May 30, 2026288 ms
Jun 6, 2026280 ms
Jun 13, 2026280 ms
Jun 20, 2026295 ms
Jun 27, 2026286 ms
Jul 4, 2026286 ms
Jul 11, 2026283 ms
Jul 18, 2026276 ms
Jul 25, 2026278 ms
Aug 1, 2026278 ms
Aug 8, 2026275 ms
Aug 15, 2026289 ms
Aug 22, 2026288 ms
Aug 29, 2026304 ms
Sep 5, 2026301 ms
Sep 12, 2026294 ms
Sep 19, 2026288 ms
Sep 26, 2026275 ms
Oct 3, 2026280 ms
Oct 10, 2026261 ms
Oct 17, 2026246 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of nexaas.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. nexaas.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. nexaas.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. nexaas.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. nexaas.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. nexaas.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. nexaas.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. nexaas.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. nexaas.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

2 to fix97
  • Google Tag Manager adds 314 ms

    314 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 314 ms of main-thread work and 513 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,626 HTML elements

    The page has 1,626 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Google/Doubleclick Ads), adding 515 KiB and 314 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    229 KiB

    About 229 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 122 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    64 KiB

    9 images could be 64 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    9 KiB

    18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 97

    97/100

    Your mobile performance score is 97 (desktop: 100). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 369 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 266 ms

    266 ms

    Real visitors wait 266 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

9 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 284 ms to 246 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 32% faster for real visitors

    -32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 129 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.0 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Gestão, vendas, canais, estoque, franquias, fiscal e financ…”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

  • Speed Index: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 1.7 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.32 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.32 g of CO₂e: 38.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.1 MB in 53 requests

    1.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.1 MB in 53 requests on a phone: scripts 602 KiB (15), images 398 KiB (29) and fonts 134 KiB (4). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 10097
  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (79 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 79 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 36 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10097
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 47 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 47 pages on nexaas.com and 5 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “Plataforma omnichannel para o varejo: pedidos, estoque, PDV, fiscal, financeiro e franquias conectados entre loja físic…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Toda a experiência omnichannel do varejo, em uma única plataforma”.

  • Title: 32 characters

    Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Nativamente Omnichannel | Nexaas”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.nexaas.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.nexaas.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,339 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.nexaas.com/llms.txt (17 KiB, 66 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 8 pages share 4 titles

    https://www.nexaas.com/oms and https://www.nexaas.com/Nexaas%20OMS.html all use the title “Sistema de Gerenciamento de Pedidos (OMS) | Nexaas”, and 3 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 8 pages share a meta description

    https://www.nexaas.com/oms and https://www.nexaas.com/Nexaas%20OMS.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.nexaas.com/Nexaas%20OMS.html, whose canonical is https://www.nexaas.com/oms. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: a star rating. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,256 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,256 words of visible text.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nexaas.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 19 issues on nexaas.com, including 7 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25