Website review, no card needed
nexigo.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202643 issues · 97 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on nexigo.com, 17 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72C- #76,286 of 97,881 reviewed websitesbeats 19%
- #45,416 of 53,367 online storesbeats 12%
- #42,205 of 48,397 Shopify storesbeats 10%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 169 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 168 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 172 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.5 s · 3.0 MBAbout 3.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
2.1 s · 195 KiBAbout 195 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
YouTube adds 1.7 s
1.7 sYouTube costs a phone 1.7 s of main-thread work and 4.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 28
28/100Your mobile performance score is 28. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.7 s
A phone's processor spends 6.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Shopify and others), adding 21.1 MB and 2.5 s of main-thread time.
Shopify adds 139 ms
139 msShopify costs a phone 139 ms of main-thread work and 15.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
650 ms · 290 KiB6 images could be 290 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 298 ms
298 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 298 ms of main-thread work and 359 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,276 HTML elements
The page has 2,276 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
tidio.co adds 72 ms
72 mstidio.co costs a phone 72 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
250 ms · 243 KiB33 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (243 KiB).
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 211 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
55 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 55 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Render-blocking requests
50 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 50 ms.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 13 ms
13 msYour server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.61
0.61For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.61 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.8 s
17.8 sYour largest element takes 17.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 51.6 s
51.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 51.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 15.2 s
15.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.585
0.585The layout shifts by 0.585 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 574 ms
574 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 574 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 169 ms to 172 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 165 ms
165 msReal visitors wait 165 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 322 ms
322 msReal visitors wait 322 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 23.7 MB in 396 requests
23.7 MBYour homepage downloads 23.7 MB in 396 requests on a phone: media 14.0 MB (5), scripts 5.9 MB (160) and images 1.4 MB (29). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (185 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 6.7 g of CO₂ per visit
6.73 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.73 g of CO₂e: 807.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Hidden but focusable
12 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
12 text elements with low contrast
12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (64 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 64 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
33 links without text
33 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
15 form fields without a label
15 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 145 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 9 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (189 characters)
Your meta description is 189 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
12 links with vague text
12 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
91 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 91 pages on nexigo.com and 11 external pages.
7 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “NexiGo”.
Title: 55 characters
Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “NexiGo | Home Theater Projectors & Video Collaborations”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.nexigo.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.nexigo.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,299 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.nexigo.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.nexigo.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://www.nexigo.com/blogs/life-style declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.nexigo.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.nexigo.com/blogs/life-style all use the title “NexiGo | Home Theater Projectors & Video Collaborations”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.nexigo.com/collections/projectors, https://www.nexigo.com/pages/support-center, https://www.nexigo.com/customer_authentication/redirect and https://www.nexigo.com/collections/projector-accessories have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.nexigo.com/pages/support-center, https://www.nexigo.com/customer_authentication/redirect and https://www.nexigo.com/products/nexigo-aurora-pro-mkii-ust-tri-color-laser-projector have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
6 pages with very little text
https://www.nexigo.com/blogs/life-style, https://www.nexigo.com/products/nexigo-aurora-pro-mkii-ust-tri-color-laser-projector, https://www.nexigo.com/products/nexigo-trivision-ultra-4k-tri-led-laser-projector, https://www.nexigo.com/nova-mini, https://www.nexigo.com/products/aurora-pro-4k-triple-color-ust-laser-projector and https://www.nexigo.com/products/iris have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 51 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected token '.'”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
41 of 45 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,263 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,263 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “RETURN TO SHOP” and “Login / Register”.
15 calls to action
The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “Learn More”, “Subscribe” and “Return To Shop”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
27 cookies set on arrival
27Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies, 5 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
48 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 48 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nexigo.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 12 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Powerful Form Builder · Pagefly Ai Page Builder · Opinew Reviews · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Searchanise Search Filter · Oxi Social Login Wishlist · Accessibly App · tidio.co · smile.io · oxiapps.com · shareasale.com · kxcdn.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on nexigo.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.