Website review, no card needed
nexsmart.se website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202640 issues · 89 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on nexsmart.se, 18 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: 40,079 HTML elements. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73C- #72,857 of 97,925 reviewed websitesbeats 22%
- #43,830 of 53,390 online storesbeats 15%
- #40,913 of 48,418 Shopify storesbeats 13%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 185 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 175 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 339 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 552 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 774 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 868 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 815 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
40,079 HTML elements
The page has 40,079 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 12.0 s
A phone's processor spends 12.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 38
38/100Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookie-Script.com, zuzana.ai and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.5 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
630 ms · 747 KiBAbout 747 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 630 ms faster on a phone.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.4 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
672 KiB13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (672 KiB).
zuzana.ai adds 549 ms
549 mszuzana.ai costs a phone 549 ms of main-thread work and 924 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Cookie-Script.com adds 579 ms
579 msCookie-Script.com costs a phone 579 ms of main-thread work and 596 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 460 ms
460 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 460 ms of main-thread work and 513 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 142 ms
142 msKlaviyo costs a phone 142 ms of main-thread work and 308 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 25 KiBAbout 25 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
33 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Improve image delivery
8 KiB1 image could be 8 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 704 ms
704 msReal visitors wait 704 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 25.1 s
25.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 3.9 s
3.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.7 s
6.7 sYour largest element takes 6.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 9.2 s
9.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 368% slower for real visitors
+368%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 185 ms to 815 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 357 ms
357 msReal visitors wait 357 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.011
0.011The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.011, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s
0.9 sThe first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.1 MB in 211 requests
4.1 MBYour homepage downloads 4.1 MB in 211 requests on a phone: scripts 2.8 MB (78), other files 802 KiB (108) and fonts 261 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.15 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.15 g of CO₂e: 138.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
56 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 64 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 56 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
52 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 52 pages on nexsmart.se and 6 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 158 characters
Your meta description is 158 characters: “På jakt efter en övervakningskamera? Skaffa en smart övervakningskamera utan abonnemang och med mobil åtkomst till live…”.
Title: 62 characters
Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “NEXSMART™-övervakningskameror ⇒ 100 dagars retur – NEXSMART SE”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://nexsmart.se/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://nexsmart.se/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
8%A phone browser shows 21,582 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 1,709. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://nexsmart.se/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
https://nexsmart.se/collections/black-month, https://nexsmart.se/collections/kamerapaket, https://nexsmart.se/collections/smart-home-sakerhet-paket, https://nexsmart.se/collections/kamera-tilbehor and https://nexsmart.se/collections/guardian-2-larmtillbehor have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
9 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
20 small tap targets
20 of 25 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “CookieInformation is not defined”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 21,582 words of copy
The homepage carries about 21,582 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
27 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nexsmart.se, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 2 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Stape Remix
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on nexsmart.se, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.