Website review, no card needed
nima.nl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202642 issues · 83 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on nima.nl, 15 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 114 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 114 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 193 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.2 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.2 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 438 KiBAbout 438 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 34
34/100Your mobile performance score is 34 (desktop: 41). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 502 KiB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (502 KiB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Facebook and others), adding 1.2 MB and 942 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce initial server response time
605 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 605 ms on a phone.
Document request latency
600 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 600 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 445 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 339 ms
339 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 339 ms of main-thread work and 533 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Clarity adds 260 ms
260 msClarity costs a phone 260 ms of main-thread work and 28 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 219 ms
219 msFacebook costs a phone 219 ms of main-thread work and 307 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Server response: 705 ms
705 msYour server takes 705 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
Improve image delivery
83 KiB1 image could be 83 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
32 KiBAbout 32 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
22 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 12.0 s
12.0 sThe first text or image appears after 12.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.3 s
18.3 sYour largest element takes 18.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We gebruiken cookies om content en advertenties te personal…”.
Time to Interactive: 28.5 s
28.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.0 s
12.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 956 ms
956 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 956 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 67% slower for real visitors
+67%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 114 ms to 193 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
20 images without width and height
20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 193 ms
193 msReal visitors wait 193 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.6 MB in 77 requests
5.6 MBYour homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 77 requests on a phone: HTML 1.8 MB (2), images 1.6 MB (22) and scripts 1.5 MB (22). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
105 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Logo-synerflow.jpg at 967 px wide, shown at 150 px. Resized copies would save about 105 KiB.
2 images in older formats
2 images (136 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (136 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.58 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.58 g of CO₂e: 189.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (5 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
35 text elements with low contrast
35 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
23 links without text
23 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (2 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (11 characters)
Your title is only 11 characters: “Home - NIMA”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Groei als marketeer. Vergroot je impact.”, “Aankomende events” and “Marketing trainingen”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
104 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 104 pages on nima.nl and 9 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.nima.nl/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.nima.nl/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
48%The HTML your server sends has 383 of the 795 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.nima.nl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
6 pages without a meta description
https://www.nima.nl/events/marketeer-of-the-year, https://www.nima.nl/trainingen-en-opleidingen/nima-a-opleiding, https://www.nima.nl/trainingen-en-opleidingen/nima-b-opleiding, https://www.nima.nl/trainingen-en-opleidingen/nima-c-opleiding, https://www.nima.nl/certificering/senior-marketing-professional and https://www.nima.nl/virtual-badge have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://www.nima.nl/trainingen-en-opleidingen/nima-c-opleiding has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 41 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
42 small tap targets
42 of 69 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 795 words of copy
The homepage carries about 795 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Register Marketeer” and “Contact”.
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Register Marketeer”, “Diploma register” and “Contact”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nima.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on nima.nl, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.