Website review, no card needed

norpac.com logo

norpac.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202638 issues · 82 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on norpac.com, 17 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.8 s3.3 sMay 9Oct 243.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20265.5 s
May 16, 20264.7 s
May 23, 20264.2 s
May 30, 20263.6 s
Jun 6, 20263.7 s
Jun 13, 20263.9 s
Jun 20, 20264.0 s
Jun 27, 20264.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.9 s
Jul 11, 20264.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.8 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20264.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.9 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.6 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.7 s
Sep 19, 20263.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.7 s
Oct 10, 20263.8 s
Oct 17, 20263.6 s
Oct 24, 20263.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
109 ms83 msMay 9Oct 2495 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026104 ms
May 16, 2026104 ms
May 23, 2026100 ms
May 30, 202696 ms
Jun 6, 202695 ms
Jun 13, 202696 ms
Jun 20, 202691 ms
Jun 27, 202686 ms
Jul 4, 202686 ms
Jul 11, 202686 ms
Jul 18, 202687 ms
Jul 25, 202687 ms
Aug 1, 202687 ms
Aug 8, 202687 ms
Aug 15, 202694 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 202696 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026103 ms
Sep 19, 2026106 ms
Sep 26, 2026103 ms
Oct 3, 2026102 ms
Oct 10, 202695 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms
Oct 24, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of norpac.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. norpac.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. norpac.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. norpac.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. norpac.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. norpac.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. norpac.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. norpac.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. norpac.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix63
  • Improve image delivery

    2.0 s · 1.1 MB

    22 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    40 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • 6,041 HTML elements

    The page has 6,041 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 63

    63/100

    Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    840 ms · 159 KiB

    About 159 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 840 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 97 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Adobe TypeKit), adding 130 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 624 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 108 ms

    108 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 108 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.2 s

    10.2 s

    Your largest element takes 10.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “tom-fessler-tractor”.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.6 s

    10.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 95 ms

    95 ms

    Real visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 28% faster for real visitors

    -28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.5 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix76
  • Page weight: 2.6 MB in 102 requests

    2.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.6 MB in 102 requests on a phone: images 1.9 MB (33), scripts 369 KiB (26) and fonts 128 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 21 images below the first screen load straight away

    21 images further down the page (1.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    tom-fessler-tractor-1024x573.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (93 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.73 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.73 g of CO₂e: 87.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8791
  • 22 tap targets too small

    22 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (18 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 18 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 28 links without text

    28 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 1 image in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 7771
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 5 links crawlers can't follow

    5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 45 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 45 pages on norpac.com and 0 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 42 characters

    Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “NORPAC | Northwest Grown for Over 90 Years”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://norpac.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://norpac.com/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    24%

    A phone browser shows 1,422 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 338. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://norpac.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 13 pages without a meta description

    https://norpac.com/retail-products, https://norpac.com/product-category/jamba-at-home-smoothies, https://norpac.com/product-category/vegetable-blends, https://norpac.com/product-category/vegetable-classics, https://norpac.com/product-category/roasted-vegetables and https://norpac.com/product-category/grande-classics-gourmet-vegetable-blends and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 13 pages without an H1

    https://norpac.com/retail-products, https://norpac.com/product-category/jamba-at-home-smoothies, https://norpac.com/product-category/vegetable-blends, https://norpac.com/product-category/vegetable-classics, https://norpac.com/product-category/roasted-vegetables and https://norpac.com/product-category/grande-classics-gourmet-vegetable-blends and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 13 pages with very little text

    https://norpac.com/retail-products, https://norpac.com/product-category/jamba-at-home-smoothies, https://norpac.com/product-category/vegetable-blends, https://norpac.com/product-category/vegetable-classics, https://norpac.com/product-category/roasted-vegetables and https://norpac.com/product-category/grande-classics-gourmet-vegetable-blends and 7 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 6 pages slow to respond

    https://norpac.com/product-category/jamba-at-home-smoothies, https://norpac.com/product-category/roasted-vegetables, https://norpac.com/product-category/premium-vegetables, https://norpac.com/product-category/steam-of-the-crop, https://norpac.com/product-category/fruits and https://norpac.com/product-category/soup-sensations took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 43 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    20 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix20
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,422 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,422 words of visible text.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at norpac.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Hosting
WP Engine

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on norpac.com, including 13 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25