Website review, no card needed
northpark.edu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202645 issues · 87 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on northpark.edu, 14 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
64DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 134 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 135 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 136 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 116 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.1 s
1.7 s
2.3 s
2.8 s
3.4 s
4.0 s
4.5 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.6 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.
Mobile performance score: 24
24/100Your mobile performance score is 24. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 12.4 MB10 images could be 12.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (rlets.com, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 757 KiB29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (757 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 535 KiBAbout 535 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 100 KiBAbout 100 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
rlets.com adds 594 ms
594 msrlets.com costs a phone 594 ms of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 499 ms
499 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 499 ms of main-thread work and 680 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.6 s
A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 224 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
44 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 44 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 28 ms
28 msYour server sent the HTML in 28 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.6 s
8.6 sYour largest element takes 8.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.005
1.005The layout shifts by 1.005 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 18.7 s
18.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 749 ms
749 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 749 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.18
0.18For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 38% slower for real visitors
+38%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.2 s
5.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 125 ms
125 msReal visitors wait 125 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 134 ms to 116 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 18.8 MB in 144 requests
18.8 MBYour homepage downloads 18.8 MB in 144 requests on a phone: images 16.6 MB (32), scripts 1.9 MB (47) and stylesheets 106 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images over 500 KB
5 images weigh 7.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
6 images far larger than shown
5.5 MB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 210922_NPU_StagedStudnetsFall21-8292.jpeg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 5.5 MB.
6 images in older formats
6 images (8.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
JasonLindsey-NorthPark-Fall2026_DSC2227-3575-scaled.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 5.3 g of CO₂ per visit
5.32 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.32 g of CO₂e: 638.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
10 tap targets too small
10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Apply by November 1.”, “2027–28 FAFSA is open.” and “Your support. Their success.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
83 internal links, 21 external
The homepage links to 83 pages on northpark.edu and 21 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 141 characters
Your meta description is 141 characters: “North Park University offers strong academics, a supportive community, and faith-based values to help you grow personal…”.
Title: 64 characters
Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “North Park University | Christian, City-Centered, Intercultural.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.northpark.edu/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.northpark.edu/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.northpark.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (782 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
7 pages without a meta description
https://www.northpark.edu/giving/ways-to-give/give, https://www.northpark.edu/mynpu, https://www.northpark.edu/academics/all-majors-programs, https://www.northpark.edu/academics/academic-calendar, https://www.northpark.edu/admissions-aid/prospective-first-year-students and https://www.northpark.edu/admissions-aid/transfer-students and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 pages without an H1
https://www.northpark.edu/admissions-aid/visit, https://www.northpark.edu/admissions-aid/apply, https://www.northpark.edu/giving/ways-to-give/give, https://www.northpark.edu/mynpu, https://www.northpark.edu/admissions-aid/transfer-students and https://www.northpark.edu/admissions-aid/international-admissions have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 59 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=16000911&Ver=2&mid=98311f35-8159-4f78-8831-3123b0ed30f2&bo=1&sid=0d674d50d44a11f1a2234743b9fb9942&vid=0d676160d44a11f1901a19936c07b807&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.
11 small tap targets
11 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
9 third-party cookies
9 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:wght@400,600&display=swap' from origin 'htt…”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 9 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 595 words of copy
The homepage carries about 595 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “INQUIRE” and “APPLY”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Inquire”, “Apply” and “Apply now”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
40 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 40 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at northpark.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Pantheon
Company
- Employees
- 752
- Founded
- 1891
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on northpark.edu, including 23 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.