Website review, no card needed
novatr.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202650 issues · 78 checks
This review found 50 issues worth fixing on novatr.com, 21 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
52FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 387 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 384 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 383 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 393 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 402 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 404 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 402 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 393 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 386 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 382 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 383 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 393 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 404 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 413 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 428 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 429 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 432 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 436 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 437 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 445 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 459 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 465 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 470 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 474 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 472 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.3 s
2.6 s
3.9 s
5.2 s
6.5 s
7.8 s
9.1 s
10.4 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.4 s · 896 KiBAbout 896 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 29
29/100Your mobile performance score is 29 (desktop: 49). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 8.9 s
A phone's processor spends 8.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Hubspot and others), adding 1.6 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.6 MB53 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.6 MB).
Google Tag Manager adds 974 ms
974 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 974 ms of main-thread work and 710 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
596 KiB12 images could be 596 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 462 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Facebook adds 418 ms
418 msFacebook costs a phone 418 ms of main-thread work and 253 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Hubspot adds 334 ms
334 msHubspot costs a phone 334 ms of main-thread work and 349 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,190 HTML elements
The page has 2,190 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 74 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 74 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
77 KiBAbout 77 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 608 ms
608 msReal visitors wait 608 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.9 s
9.9 sYour largest element takes 9.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hero Banner Background”.
Time to Interactive: 23.6 s
23.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.7 s
2.7 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 9.3 s
9.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.0 s
4.0 sThe first text or image appears after 4.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.17
0.17For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors
+23%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 387 ms to 472 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 847 ms
847 msReal visitors wait 847 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.5 MB in 198 requests
3.5 MBYour homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 198 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (69), images 902 KiB (38) and other files 113 KiB (83). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
136 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Updated_Hero_Image_2.webp at 2,021 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 136 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (93 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (20 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.01 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.01 g of CO₂e: 120.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
36 buttons without a name
36 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
19 tap targets too small
19 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (193 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 193 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (3 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
33 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No page title
Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
2 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.novatr.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 1,312 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.novatr.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 37 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,312 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,312 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Request a Call Back”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
51 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 51 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at novatr.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 50 issues on novatr.com, including 23 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.