Website review, no card needed
novin.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202650 issues · 107 checks
This review found 50 issues worth fixing on novin.com, 15 of them high impact, across 107 checks. The most urgent: font display. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77C- #44,354 of 81,078 reviewed websitesbeats 40%
- #25,407 of 40,017 online storesbeats 31%
- #791 of 2,107 WooCommerce storesbeats 58%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 6.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 7.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 8.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 9.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 9.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 9.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 6.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 145 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Font display
1.6 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.6 s).
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
700 ms · 464 KiB94 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (464 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 79
79/100Your mobile performance score is 79. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, yektanet.com and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 548 KiB and 524 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 107 KiB7 images could be 107 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 488 ms
488 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 488 ms of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,383 HTML elements
The page has 2,383 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused CSS
230 ms · 55 KiBAbout 55 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 230 ms faster on a phone.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 220 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
205 KiBAbout 205 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.5 s
A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 559 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 388 ms
388 msYour server sent the HTML in 388 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 7.3 s
7.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 8.9 s
8.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 8.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 29% slower for real visitors
+29%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 145 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 287 ms
287 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 287 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.118
0.118The layout shifts by 0.118 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sYour largest element takes 2.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image. Most of its time is resource load delay (2.0 s).
Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.2 s to 4.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 122 ms
122 msReal visitors wait 122 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
1 image over 500 KB
course-cover-final-2-copy.jpg weighs 804 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
Page weight: 3.3 MB in 114 requests
3.3 MBYour homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 114 requests on a phone: images 2.2 MB (71), scripts 607 KiB (16) and fonts 314 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
21 images in older formats
21 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image far larger than shown
15 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example saeed-novin-digital-marketing.jpg at 1,280 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 15 KiB.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.92 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.92 g of CO₂e: 110.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
55 images without alt text
55 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
414 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 414 pages on novin.com and 7 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 92 characters
Your meta description is 92 characters: “از صفر تا صد دیجیتال مارکتینگ و سئو را با آموزش های رایگان و دوره های تخصصی نوین یاد بگیرید.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “آموزش، معرفی و استخدام دیجیتال مارکترهای ایران”.
Title: 44 characters
Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “نوین | دوره های تخصصی دیجیتال مارکتینگ و سئو”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.novin.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.novin.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (13 KiB, 108 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/ns-campaign is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
/ns-campaign has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /academy/start-bussines, whose canonical is /academy/start-business. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
/academy has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages slow to respond
/ns-campaign, /academy, /academy/start-bussines and /academy/youtube-bundle took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 153 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “jQuery is not defined”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
29 of 29 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
2 insecure resources on an https page
2 resources load over plain http on your https page (for example http://www.novin.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/text-course-cover-copy-1.jpg); browsers block or warn about them.
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.aparat.com/novin.com (504).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (novin.com).
Valid certificate (20 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for novin.com and is valid for another 20 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://novin.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
novin.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
novin.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 23 years old
23 yearsnovin.com was registered in Aug 2003 through CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH d/b/a joker.com. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Aug 2028
novin.com is registered until Aug 2028.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Only about 73 words
The homepage has only about 73 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Email authentication
No DMARC policy
novin.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 35/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
1 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 mx include:spf.imcloud.org ~all”.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Asiatech
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 50 issues on novin.com, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.