Website review, no card needed

nu.edu.kz logo

nu.edu.kz website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202651 issues · 97 checks

This review found 51 issues worth fixing on nu.edu.kz, 16 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.7 s2.0 sMay 9Oct 242.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.1 s
May 16, 20264.1 s
May 23, 20264.1 s
May 30, 20264.1 s
Jun 6, 20264.1 s
Jun 13, 20264.1 s
Jun 20, 20264.2 s
Jun 27, 20264.3 s
Jul 4, 20264.4 s
Jul 11, 20264.3 s
Jul 18, 20264.2 s
Jul 25, 20264.1 s
Aug 1, 20264.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.9 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.6 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
186 ms154 msMay 9Oct 24160 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026169 ms
May 16, 2026173 ms
May 23, 2026174 ms
May 30, 2026174 ms
Jun 6, 2026170 ms
Jun 13, 2026167 ms
Jun 20, 2026166 ms
Jun 27, 2026167 ms
Jul 4, 2026164 ms
Jul 11, 2026163 ms
Jul 18, 2026166 ms
Jul 25, 2026165 ms
Aug 1, 2026174 ms
Aug 8, 2026173 ms
Aug 15, 2026179 ms
Aug 22, 2026182 ms
Aug 29, 2026172 ms
Sep 5, 2026170 ms
Sep 12, 2026162 ms
Sep 19, 2026158 ms
Sep 26, 2026160 ms
Oct 3, 2026161 ms
Oct 10, 2026161 ms
Oct 17, 2026160 ms
Oct 24, 2026160 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of nu.edu.kz (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. nu.edu.kz at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. nu.edu.kz at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. nu.edu.kz at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. nu.edu.kz at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. nu.edu.kz at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. nu.edu.kz at 5.5 s5.5 s
  7. nu.edu.kz at 6.4 s6.4 s
  8. nu.edu.kz at 7.3 s7.3 s

Speed

11 to fix66
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Main-thread work: 5.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 7.8 MB

    110 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.8 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    6.7 MB

    6 images could be 6.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 690 KiB

    About 690 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and userway.org and others), adding 1.3 MB and 897 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 66

    66/100

    Your mobile performance score is 66 (desktop: 57). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • YouTube adds 688 ms

    688 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 688 ms of main-thread work and 979 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 183 KiB

    About 183 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 291 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 1,772 HTML elements

    The page has 1,772 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    20 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 197 ms

    197 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 197 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.33

    0.33

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.33 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 33.3 s

    33.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 33.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.8 s

    8.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Your largest element takes 4.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “NU Achieves Second Consecutive 100-Place Rise in Global Ran…”.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 316 ms

    316 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 316 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 169 ms to 160 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 156 ms

    156 ms

    Real visitors wait 156 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 40% faster for real visitors

    -40%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 9.2 MB in 137 requests

    9.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.2 MB in 137 requests on a phone: images 7.4 MB (26), scripts 1.4 MB (48) and stylesheets 205 KiB (49). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    img_4506.jpg weighs 6.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    6.6 MB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example img_4506.jpg at 3,861 px wide, shown at 60 px. Resized copies would save about 6.6 MB.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (6.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (6.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.60 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.60 g of CO₂e: 312.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8288
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    2 dropdowns have no label.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (12 elements)

    [role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 11 text elements with low contrast

    11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (33 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 33 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 29 links without text

    29 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6 and h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 36 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8573
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is long (71 characters)

    Your title is 71 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Nazarbayev University - Leading University in Central Asia & Kazakhstan”.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“NU Hosts High-Level Roundtable on a Key Kazakhsta…” and “Info-Session for NU MSc in Finance program”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 255 internal links, 67 external

    The homepage links to 255 pages on nu.edu.kz and 67 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://nu.edu.kz/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Article, Organization, Person, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://nu.edu.kz/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://nu.edu.kz/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (916 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix76
  • 2 pages point its canonical at the homepage

    https://nu.edu.kz/kk and https://nu.edu.kz/ru declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://nu.edu.kz/admissions/how-to-apply/foundation-undergraduate/regular-admissions and https://nu.edu.kz/admissions/how-to-apply/masters/regular-admissions-masters all use the title “Regular Admissions - Nazarbayev University”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://nu.edu.kz/kk, https://nu.edu.kz/ru, https://nu.edu.kz/admissions/announcements and https://nu.edu.kz/admissions/testimonials have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://nu.edu.kz/admissions/how-to-apply/foundation-undergraduate/regular-admissions and https://nu.edu.kz/admissions/how-to-apply/masters/regular-admissions-masters use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://nu.edu.kz/kk and https://nu.edu.kz/ru have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 122 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7388
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix88
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 384 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 384 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Apply Now”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “How to Apply”, “Apply Now” and “Step Into Your Future Book a Campus Tour”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nu.edu.kz, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Kaztelecom

Company

Founded
2009

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 51 issues on nu.edu.kz, including 22 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25