Website review, no card needed
nu.edu.kz website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202651 issues · 97 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on nu.edu.kz, 16 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 169 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 173 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 174 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 160 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.4 s19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.
Main-thread work: 5.5 s
A phone's processor spends 5.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
900 ms · 7.8 MB110 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.8 MB).
Improve image delivery
6.7 MB6 images could be 6.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 690 KiBAbout 690 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and userway.org and others), adding 1.3 MB and 897 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 66
66/100Your mobile performance score is 66 (desktop: 57). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
YouTube adds 688 ms
688 msYouTube costs a phone 688 ms of main-thread work and 979 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 183 KiBAbout 183 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 291 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,772 HTML elements
The page has 1,772 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
20 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 197 ms
197 msYour server sent the HTML in 197 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.33
0.33For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.33 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 33.3 s
33.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.8 s
8.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.8 s
4.8 sYour largest element takes 4.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “NU Achieves Second Consecutive 100-Place Rise in Global Ran…”.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 316 ms
316 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 316 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
7 images without width and height
7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 169 ms to 160 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 156 ms
156 msReal visitors wait 156 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 40% faster for real visitors
-40%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.2 MB in 137 requests
9.2 MBYour homepage downloads 9.2 MB in 137 requests on a phone: images 7.4 MB (26), scripts 1.4 MB (48) and stylesheets 205 KiB (49). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
img_4506.jpg weighs 6.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
6.6 MB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example img_4506.jpg at 3,861 px wide, shown at 60 px. Resized copies would save about 6.6 MB.
5 images in older formats
5 images (6.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (6.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.60 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.60 g of CO₂e: 312.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
2 dropdowns have no label.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (12 elements)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (33 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 33 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
29 links without text
29 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6 and h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 36 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is long (71 characters)
Your title is 71 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Nazarbayev University - Leading University in Central Asia & Kazakhstan”.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“NU Hosts High-Level Roundtable on a Key Kazakhsta…” and “Info-Session for NU MSc in Finance program”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
255 internal links, 67 external
The homepage links to 255 pages on nu.edu.kz and 67 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://nu.edu.kz/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, Organization, Person, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://nu.edu.kz/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://nu.edu.kz/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (916 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages point its canonical at the homepage
https://nu.edu.kz/kk and https://nu.edu.kz/ru declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
https://nu.edu.kz/admissions/how-to-apply/foundation-undergraduate/regular-admissions and https://nu.edu.kz/admissions/how-to-apply/masters/regular-admissions-masters all use the title “Regular Admissions - Nazarbayev University”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages without a meta description
https://nu.edu.kz/kk, https://nu.edu.kz/ru, https://nu.edu.kz/admissions/announcements and https://nu.edu.kz/admissions/testimonials have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://nu.edu.kz/admissions/how-to-apply/foundation-undergraduate/regular-admissions and https://nu.edu.kz/admissions/how-to-apply/masters/regular-admissions-masters use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 pages with very little text
https://nu.edu.kz/kk and https://nu.edu.kz/ru have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 122 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 small tap targets
5 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 384 words of copy
The homepage carries about 384 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Apply Now”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “How to Apply”, “Apply Now” and “Step Into Your Future Book a Campus Tour”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nu.edu.kz, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Kaztelecom
Company
- Founded
- 2009
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on nu.edu.kz, including 22 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.