Website review, no card needed
nuevachevallier.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202656 issues · 104 checks
This review found 56 issues worth fixing on nuevachevallier.com, 20 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66D- #74,277 of 81,503 reviewed websitesbeats 7%
- #38,504 of 40,351 online storesbeats 4%
- #193 of 257 Salesforce Commerce Cloud storesbeats 21%
Closest competitors among Salesforce Commerce Cloud stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 848 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 788 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 771 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 764 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 757 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 770 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 760 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 758 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 726 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 707 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 673 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 646 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 630 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 602 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 578 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 553 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 560 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 564 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 574 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 592 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 585 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 578 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 579 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 579 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 577 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
nuevachevallier.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 485 KiBAbout 485 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 s · 408 KiB34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (408 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Improve image delivery
1.1 MB18 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and CleverTap and others), adding 985 KiB and 947 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 61
61/100Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 481 ms
481 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 481 ms of main-thread work and 530 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
430 ms · 43 KiBAbout 43 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 430 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
350 ms · 35 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 255 ms
255 msFacebook costs a phone 255 ms of main-thread work and 281 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 222 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.4 s
11.4 sYour largest element takes 11.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “null”.
Time to Interactive: 12.3 s
12.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 938 ms
938 msReal visitors wait 938 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.1 s
5.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 392 ms
392 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 392 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
27 images without width and height
27 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 29% faster for real visitors
-29%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 848 ms to 577 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.03
0.03The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.03, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.7 MB in 121 requests
7.7 MBYour homepage downloads 7.7 MB in 121 requests on a phone: images 6.3 MB (62), scripts 1.1 MB (28) and fonts 221 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
banner-medios-de-pago-web-che.gif weighs 3.9 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
1 image far larger than shown
2.4 MB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example banner-medios-de-pago-web-che.gif at 1,900 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 2.4 MB.
23 images in older formats
23 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
negative-logo.svg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (364 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit
2.19 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.19 g of CO₂e: 263.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
24 text elements with low contrast
24 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
17 images without alt text
17 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6, h3 → h6 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.nuevachevallier.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at nuevachevallier.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
73 internal links, 17 external
The homepage links to 73 pages on nuevachevallier.com and 17 external pages.
2 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Volvemos en un ratito ⏰”.
Title: 51 characters
Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “Chevallier oficial | Comprá pasajes de micro online”.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
12 pages share 2 titles
/ and /inicio all use the title “Chevallier oficial | Comprá pasajes de micro online”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
/medios-de-pago.html, /on/demandware.store/Sites-Chevallier-Site/es_AR/ContactUs-Landing, /faqs.html, /inicio, /destinos-para-viajar-por-argentina.html and /alquiler-de-unidades.html and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
/destinos-para-viajar-por-argentina.html, /on/demandware.store/Sites-Chevallier-Site/es_AR/Order-RefundForm and /cybermonday.html have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
12 small tap targets
12 of 32 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
3 broken links to your own pages
3 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://www.nuevachevallier.com/rutas.html (500).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://wa.me/5491161645323.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (nuevachevallier.com).
Valid certificate (69 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for nuevachevallier.com and is valid for another 69 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://nuevachevallier.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
nuevachevallier.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
nuevachevallier.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 26 years old
26 yearsnuevachevallier.com was registered in Oct 2000 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Oct 2028
nuevachevallier.com is registered until Oct 2028.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 13-field form
Your longest form asks for 13 fields (6 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
Only about 149 words
The homepage has only about 149 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be nuevachevallier.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 60/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
1 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 a:staging.na01.flechabus.demandware.net a:production.na01.flechabus.demandware.net include:spf.fromdoppler.com +…”.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 56 issues on nuevachevallier.com, including 20 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.