Website review, no card needed
nyee.edu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202649 issues · 89 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on nyee.edu, 18 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
64DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 480 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 450 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 421 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 424 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 421 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 420 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 395 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 391 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 406 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 405 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 405 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 405 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 396 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 403 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 410 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 415 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 394 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 363 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 224 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
9.7 s · 2.9 MB58 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.9 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.8 s · 495 KiBAbout 495 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.6 s16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.
Minify JavaScript
2.2 s · 375 KiB375 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Improve image delivery
1.1 s · 1.2 MB10 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31 (desktop: 52). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (user1st.info, Google CDN and piwik.pro and others), adding 1.7 MB and 863 ms of main-thread time.
user1st.info adds 427 ms
427 msuser1st.info costs a phone 427 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 66 KiBAbout 66 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 360 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.36
0.36For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.36 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.1 s
19.1 sYour largest element takes 19.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Eye doctor checking patient”.
Time to Interactive: 19.3 s
19.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.6 s
5.6 sThe first text or image appears after 5.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.5 s
8.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.335
0.335The layout shifts by 0.335 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user INP: 247 ms
247 msReal visitors wait 247 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 397 ms
397 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 397 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
20 images without width and height
20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 483 ms
483 msReal visitors wait 483 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 51% faster for real visitors
-51%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 480 ms to 224 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.9 MB in 87 requests
3.9 MBYour homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 87 requests on a phone: images 1.8 MB (17), scripts 1.5 MB (37) and fonts 247 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
9 images in older formats
9 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (1.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
5 images far larger than shown
56 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Release-Resize-CenterRefractiveSolutions.png at 770 px wide, shown at 250 px. Resized copies would save about 56 KiB.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.10 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.10 g of CO₂e: 132.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (3 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (68 characters)
Your title is 68 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “New York Eye & Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai NYC | New York Eye & Ear”.
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“New York Eye and Ear Infirmary”, “Eyewear You Can Trust. Expertise You Can See.” and “New Center for Refractive Solutions at NYEE”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Hospital and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at nyee.edu/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:title, so shared links fall back to guesses.
66 internal links, 164 external
The homepage links to 66 pages on nyee.edu and 164 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 156 characters
Your meta description is 156 characters: “Mount Sinai's New York Eye and Ear Infirmary is one of the world's leading facilities for treating diseases of the eyes…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.nyee.edu/.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.nyee.edu/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.nyee.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,289 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.nyee.edu/care/eye/after-hours-emergency has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://www.nyee.edu/find-a-doctor has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages slow to respond
https://www.nyee.edu/about/locations and https://www.nyee.edu/care took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.nyee.edu/.
15 small tap targets
15 of 31 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,283 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,283 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Optical Shop at NYEE” and “Learn more”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at nyee.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- Mount Sinai
Company
- Founded
- 1820
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on nyee.edu, including 21 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.