Website review, no card needed

ofaspen.com logo

ofaspen.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202629 issues · 81 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on ofaspen.com, 9 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 36.1 MB in 215 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.0 sMay 23Nov 71.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.2 s
Oct 3, 20261.2 s
Oct 10, 20261.1 s
Oct 17, 20261.1 s
Oct 24, 20261.1 s
Oct 31, 20261.1 s
Nov 7, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
143 ms99 msMay 23Nov 7124 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026104 ms
May 30, 2026115 ms
Jun 6, 2026121 ms
Jun 13, 2026123 ms
Jun 20, 2026129 ms
Jun 27, 2026130 ms
Jul 4, 2026121 ms
Jul 11, 2026120 ms
Jul 18, 2026113 ms
Jul 25, 2026106 ms
Aug 1, 2026113 ms
Aug 8, 2026113 ms
Aug 15, 2026113 ms
Aug 22, 2026120 ms
Aug 29, 2026129 ms
Sep 5, 2026132 ms
Sep 12, 2026138 ms
Sep 19, 2026133 ms
Sep 26, 2026124 ms
Oct 3, 2026128 ms
Oct 10, 2026120 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms
Oct 24, 2026113 ms
Oct 31, 2026113 ms
Nov 7, 2026124 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ofaspen.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ofaspen.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. ofaspen.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. ofaspen.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. ofaspen.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. ofaspen.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. ofaspen.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. ofaspen.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  8. ofaspen.com at 3.6 s3.6 s

Speed

5 to fix77
  • Improve image delivery

    1.1 s · 626 KiB

    11 images could be 626 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 4.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 431 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,193 HTML elements

    The page has 3,193 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 77

    77/100

    Your mobile performance score is 77. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    500 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 122 KiB

    About 122 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Adroll and Shopify and others), adding 469 KiB and 198 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 31 KiB

    About 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    139 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (139 KiB).

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 119 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

2 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Your largest element takes 5.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 124 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

11 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 155 ms

    155 ms

    Real visitors wait 155 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 644 ms

    644 ms

    Real visitors wait 644 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 136 ms

    136 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 136 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.5 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

2 to fix69
  • Page weight: 36.1 MB in 215 requests

    36.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 36.1 MB in 215 requests on a phone: media 32.2 MB (4), images 2.3 MB (58) and other files 743 KiB (78). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    steps-down-into-a-lush-forest.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (28 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 10.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    10.22 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.22 g of CO₂e: 1226.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9195
  • 4 images without alt text

    4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9284
  • Title is short (22 characters)

    Your title is only 22 characters: “Of Aspen Curated Gifts”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (299 characters)

    Your meta description is 299 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 171 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 171 pages on ofaspen.com and 16 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Of Aspen Curated Gifts”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://ofaspen.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ofaspen.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,644 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://ofaspen.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://ofaspen.com/collections/paper-stationery-1, https://ofaspen.com/collections/notebooks, https://ofaspen.com/collections/notepads, https://ofaspen.com/collections/page-flags-sticky-notes, https://ofaspen.com/collections/planners-calendars-advent and https://ofaspen.com/collections/cards and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 80 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://d.adroll.com/uev/OMS57QPKZVCHRNXPCBH3HA/WD37CHKHFFHQTHYWZWIW3U/?adroll_tpc=lx3%3Dlex-875dcf7e-8824-4efd-8dd5-36b3b8e5e127&af0=0fe6f973&adroll_fpc=d871ab2dc0e6dcc46483676d8d92887c-1794431751844.

  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 39 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

7 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 211 words

    The homepage has only about 211 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 18 calls to action

    The homepage has 18 calls to action, for example “Entire Shop Collection”, “Contact Us” and “The Little Ghost Who Was a Quilt Book”.

  • 6 short forms

    6 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Pinterest Tag and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ofaspen.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 4 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Loyalty Program · affiliatly.com · nfcube.com · adroll.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on ofaspen.com, including 7 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 7 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25