Website review, no card needed
ohiodems.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202635 issues · 83 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on ohiodems.org, 15 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 86 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 111 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
7.5 s · 6.7 MB118 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.7 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.5 s · 483 KiBAbout 483 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.6 s24 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.
Improve image delivery
1.8 s · 775 KiB13 images could be 775 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 51
51/100Your mobile performance score is 51 (desktop: 52). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (everyaction.com, Facebook and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.0 MB and 662 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 130 KiBAbout 130 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 223 ms
223 msFacebook costs a phone 223 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
everyaction.com adds 248 ms
248 mseveryaction.com costs a phone 248 ms of main-thread work and 417 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 915 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 192 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
42 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 7 ms
7 msYour server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.0 s
19.0 sYour largest element takes 19.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Ohio Democrats”.
Time to Interactive: 19.5 s
19.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.2 s
5.2 sThe first text or image appears after 5.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.4 s
8.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 28% slower for real visitors
+28%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 87 ms to 111 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 284 ms
284 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 284 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 105 ms
105 msReal visitors wait 105 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 399 ms
399 msReal visitors wait 399 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 32% faster for real visitors
-32%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.7 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.068
0.068The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.068, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.3 MB in 143 requests
10.3 MBYour homepage downloads 10.3 MB in 143 requests on a phone: media 5.5 MB (4), images 3.3 MB (60) and scripts 1.1 MB (49). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images far larger than shown
620 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 846322108_1711138023768446_1020271741973611817_n.jpg at 1,080 px wide, shown at 287 px. Resized copies would save about 620 KiB.
11 images in older formats
11 images (1.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
8 images below the first screen load straight away
8 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.9 g of CO₂ per visit
2.93 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.93 g of CO₂e: 351.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 49 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (16 characters)
Your title is only 16 characters: “Ohio Democrats -”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is short (25 characters)
Your meta description is only 25 characters: “Fighting for Ohio Workers”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
24 internal links, 191 external
The homepage links to 24 pages on ohiodems.org and 191 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Ohio Democrats”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://ohiodems.org/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ohiodems.org/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,644 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://ohiodems.org/news and https://ohiodems.org/map have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page with very little text
https://ohiodems.org/map has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
7 internal pages checked
We fetched 7 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
2 pages of 7 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 2 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 broken images
4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://ohiodems.org/wp-content/uploads/sb-twitter-feed-images/2112646794912129112-0-800.jpg.
22 small tap targets
22 of 43 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,262 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,262 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact Us at [email protected]”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 8 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ohiodems.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on ohiodems.org, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.