Website review, no card needed

ohgreen.be logo

ohgreen.be website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202645 issues · 101 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on ohgreen.be, 23 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.5 s1.4 sMay 9Oct 241.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
208 ms145 msMay 9Oct 24201 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026152 ms
May 16, 2026155 ms
May 23, 2026161 ms
May 30, 2026163 ms
Jun 6, 2026165 ms
Jun 13, 2026167 ms
Jun 20, 2026169 ms
Jun 27, 2026172 ms
Jul 4, 2026176 ms
Jul 11, 2026180 ms
Jul 18, 2026180 ms
Jul 25, 2026180 ms
Aug 1, 2026178 ms
Aug 8, 2026179 ms
Aug 15, 2026180 ms
Aug 22, 2026183 ms
Aug 29, 2026186 ms
Sep 5, 2026186 ms
Sep 12, 2026185 ms
Sep 19, 2026186 ms
Sep 26, 2026188 ms
Oct 3, 2026190 ms
Oct 10, 2026194 ms
Oct 17, 2026197 ms
Oct 24, 2026201 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ohgreen.be (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ohgreen.be at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. ohgreen.be at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. ohgreen.be at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. ohgreen.be at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. ohgreen.be at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. ohgreen.be at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. ohgreen.be at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. ohgreen.be at 3.0 s3.0 s

ohgreen.be does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

11 to fix33
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    33.0 s · 14.0 MB

    38 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14.0 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    28.4 s · 11.7 MB

    25 images could be 11.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 28.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.2 s · 840 KiB

    About 840 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.2 s · 243 KiB

    About 243 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 33

    33/100

    Your mobile performance score is 33. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 1.7 MB and 741 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 315 ms

    315 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 315 ms of main-thread work and 529 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 239 ms

    239 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 239 ms of main-thread work and 742 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,584 HTML elements

    The page has 2,584 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 114 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    20 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 27 ms

    27 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 27 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.26

    0.26

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.26 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 42.0 s

    42.0 s

    Your largest element takes 42.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “De magie begint hier! Laat je inspireren”.

  • Time to Interactive: 43.5 s

    43.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 43.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.736

    0.736

    The layout shifts by 0.736 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 202 ms

    202 ms

    Real visitors wait 202 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 30% slower for real visitors

    +30%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 201 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 233 ms

    233 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 233 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 427 ms

    427 ms

    Real visitors wait 427 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 16.1 MB in 85 requests

    16.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 16.1 MB in 85 requests on a phone: images 13.5 MB (53), scripts 1.8 MB (14) and other files 357 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images over 500 KB

    6 images weigh 9.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    4.9 MB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Gardena_Cashback_Dompelpompen_WEB.png at 1,813 px wide, shown at 288 px. Resized copies would save about 4.9 MB.

  • 12 images in older formats

    12 images (10.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (4.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.55 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.55 g of CO₂e: 546.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7889
  • 20 buttons without a name

    20 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 8 tap targets too small

    8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 12 images without alt text

    12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8580
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (199 characters)

    Your meta description is 199 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 174 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 174 pages on ohgreen.be and 6 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 30 characters

    Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “Oh'Green zet je leven op groen”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.ohgreen.be/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ohgreen.be/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (576 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 14 pages without a meta description

    /kerst, /groen, /dier, /lifestyle, /onze-tuincentra and /promoties and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    /kerst, /nl/oh-green/nieuws-updates, /kerst/kerstspeelgoed, /kerst/kerstornamenten, /kerst/feesttafel and /kerst/lemax-kerstdorpen have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    /kerst, /lifestyle, /digitale-cadeaukaart/1163177 and /onze-tuincentra took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 142 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    74 of 80 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • 3 links through redirect chains

    3 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.ohgreen.be/account/profile.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (ohgreen.be).

  • Valid certificate (33 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for ohgreen.be and is valid for another 33 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://ohgreen.be redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 44 links work

    All 44 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 4 external) answered without errors; 5 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    ohgreen.be has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 506 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 506 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop onze cadeaukaart hier!”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Shop onze cadeaukaart hier!”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:83.217.70.227 -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Combell

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on ohgreen.be, including 23 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25