Website review, no card needed
omi.me website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202634 issues · 74 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on omi.me, 8 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 9.1 MB in 226 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76C- #57,612 of 94,287 reviewed websitesbeats 34%
- #35,090 of 50,567 online storesbeats 26%
- #33,094 of 45,701 Shopify storesbeats 23%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 313 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
600 ms · 526 KiB6 images could be 526 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 61
61/100Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
350 ms · 490 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (490 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 181 KiBAbout 181 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,733 HTML elements
The page has 1,733 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Intercom, Klaviyo and Shopify and others), adding 686 KiB and 435 ms of main-thread time.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 157 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Reduce unused CSS
29 KiBAbout 29 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 10 ms
10 msYour server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.7 s
17.7 sYour largest element takes 17.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 18.8 s
18.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.6 s
7.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 284 ms
284 msReal visitors wait 284 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 137% slower for real visitors
+137%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 313 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 87% slower for real visitors
+87%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sThe first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
10 images without width and height
10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 161 ms
161 msScripts block the page for only 161 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.1 MB in 226 requests
9.1 MBYour homepage downloads 9.1 MB in 226 requests on a phone: images 3.7 MB (49), media 3.5 MB (3) and other files 957 KiB (99). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
18 images far larger than shown
1.7 MB18 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example real-cafe-2.jpg at 1,536 px wide, shown at 304 px. Resized copies would save about 1.7 MB.
22 images in older formats
22 images (3.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
18 images below the first screen load straight away
18 images further down the page (2.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.58 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.58 g of CO₂e: 309.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
6 buttons without a name
6 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes
Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes (43 elements).
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 51 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
Meta description is long (165 characters)
Your meta description is 165 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: sameAs is an empty list”.
20 internal links, 19 external
The homepage links to 20 pages on omi.me and 19 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Your personal AI assistant”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Omi AI - Wearable Notetaker Pendant That is Always Listening”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.omi.me/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.omi.me/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,691 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.omi.me/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.omi.me/trust is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.omi.me/pages/careers, https://www.omi.me/blogs/events and https://www.omi.me/trust have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.omi.me/manifesto, whose canonical is https://www.omi.me/pages/manifesto. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.omi.me/pages/careers and https://www.omi.me/trust have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
14 internal pages checked
We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
6 pages of 14 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
9 of 9 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
About 2,646 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,646 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Buy now” and “Get your Omi today”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Buy now”, “Get your Omi today” and “Orders & pricing”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Hotjar.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 4 email links.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
37 cookies set on arrival
37Opening the homepage sets 37 cookies, 4 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
47 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 47 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at omi.me, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 12 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Blockify Fraud Filter · Avada Seo Ai Blog · Avada Seo Suite · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Uppromote Affiliate · Triplewhale · Gempages Builder · Region Restrictions · Gempages Cro · Affliate By Secomapp · goaffpro.com · intercom.io
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Hotjar
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on omi.me, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.