Website review, no card needed

omnidian.com logo

omnidian.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202637 issues · 82 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on omnidian.com, 13 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s1.7 sMay 9Oct 242.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
111 ms86 msMay 9Oct 24104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026105 ms
May 16, 2026105 ms
May 23, 2026106 ms
May 30, 202695 ms
Jun 6, 2026104 ms
Jun 13, 2026108 ms
Jun 20, 2026107 ms
Jun 27, 2026105 ms
Jul 4, 2026100 ms
Jul 11, 202694 ms
Jul 18, 202691 ms
Jul 25, 202689 ms
Aug 1, 202692 ms
Aug 8, 202692 ms
Aug 15, 202693 ms
Aug 22, 202693 ms
Aug 29, 202695 ms
Sep 5, 202697 ms
Sep 12, 202699 ms
Sep 19, 2026102 ms
Sep 26, 2026103 ms
Oct 3, 2026103 ms
Oct 10, 2026105 ms
Oct 17, 2026106 ms
Oct 24, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of omnidian.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. omnidian.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. omnidian.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. omnidian.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. omnidian.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. omnidian.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. omnidian.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. omnidian.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. omnidian.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix53
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.3 s

    33 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 606 KiB

    About 606 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    600 ms · 973 KiB

    11 images could be 973 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    760 ms · 167 KiB

    About 167 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 760 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 51 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (51 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 770 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google CDN adds 150 ms

    150 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 150 ms of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and datagrail.io and others), adding 582 KiB and 365 ms of main-thread time.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 166 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.8 s

    13.8 s

    Your largest element takes 13.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.2 s

    14.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.22

    0.22

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.22 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 850 ms

    850 ms

    Real visitors wait 850 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 24 images without width and height

    24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.143

    0.143

    The layout shifts by 0.143 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 229 ms

    229 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 229 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 116 ms

    116 ms

    Real visitors wait 116 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Images and page weight

4 to fix48
  • 5 images far larger than shown

    838 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example img-solar-panel2x-scaled.jpg at 2,560 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 838 KiB.

  • Page weight: 3.1 MB in 112 requests

    3.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 112 requests on a phone: images 1.9 MB (55), scripts 913 KiB (36) and stylesheets 228 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 10 images in older formats

    10 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 7 images below the first screen load straight away

    7 images further down the page (1.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.87 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.87 g of CO₂e: 104.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7788
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 18 tap targets too small

    18 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 7 images without alt text

    7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 40 links without text

    40 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h4 → h6, h4 → h6 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9286
  • Title is long (79 characters)

    Your title is 79 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Omnidian: Solar System Performance Assurance, Management & Servicing - Omnidian”.

  • Meta description is long (190 characters)

    Your meta description is 190 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 88 internal links, 52 external

    The homepage links to 88 pages on omnidian.com and 52 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Unmatched Transparency & Control of Your Assets”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.omnidian.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.omnidian.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.omnidian.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (776 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.omnidian.com/solutions/residential-solar-financing-providers and https://www.omnidian.com/insights have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected identifier 'width'”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix83
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • About 873 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 873 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Talk To A Sales Expert”, “Book a 15-min Portfolio Review” and “Contact a Sales Exec”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 12 testimonial or review blocks, 11 customer or partner logos, 1 trust badge and “250 + Clients”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at omnidian.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Hiring

Hiring
9 open roles
Teams
CRM Engineering (2), Accounting (1), Business Development (1), Field Service Operations (1)
Job board
lever

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on omnidian.com, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25