Website review, no card needed
onapsis.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202630 issues · 85 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on onapsis.com, 10 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 178 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 175 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 248 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 358 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 364 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 236 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.4 s · 260 KiBAbout 260 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
5,660 HTML elements
The page has 5,660 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 63
63/100Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 159 KiBAbout 159 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 383 ms
383 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 383 ms of main-thread work and 539 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and weglot.com and others), adding 758 KiB and 449 ms of main-thread time.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 123 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
35 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (35 KiB).
Improve image delivery
23 KiB1 image could be 23 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.7 s
A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 587 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 29 ms
29 msYour server sent the HTML in 29 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.8 s
8.8 sYour largest element takes 8.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Complete SAP Security for the Autonomous Enterprise Protect…”.
Time to Interactive: 9.0 s
9.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 220 ms
220 msReal visitors wait 220 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 96% slower for real visitors
+96%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 128 ms to 236 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.5 s
5.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 151 ms
151 msScripts block the page for only 151 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit
0.33 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.33 g of CO₂e: 40.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.2 MB in 79 requests
1.2 MBYour homepage downloads 1.2 MB in 79 requests on a phone: scripts 742 KiB (18), images 169 KiB (30) and HTML 125 KiB (2). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
7 text elements with low contrast
7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 42 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
269 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 269 pages on onapsis.com and 20 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 129 characters
Your meta description is 129 characters: “Level-up your SAP security with Onapsis-trusted and endorsed by SAP and recognized by Gartner. Protect & optimize your …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Complete SAP Security for the Autonomous Enterprise”.
Title: 48 characters
Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Onapsis | The Leading SAP Cybersecurity Platform”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://onapsis.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://onapsis.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,147 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://onapsis.com/llms.txt (7 KiB, 37 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://onapsis.com/defenders is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
15 pages without an H1
https://onapsis.com/why-onapsis, https://onapsis.com/why-onapsis/why-secure-sap-ai-and-rise-now, https://onapsis.com/why-onapsis/why-sap-endorses-onapsis, https://onapsis.com/why-onapsis/onapsis-ai-advantage, https://onapsis.com/company/recognition and https://onapsis.com/trust-center and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://onapsis.com/why-onapsis/why-secure-sap-ai-and-rise-now and https://onapsis.com/why-onapsis/why-sap-endorses-onapsis have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 82 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
11 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,827 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,827 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “TALK TO AN EXPERT”.
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Start Now”, “Contact UsGet in Touch” and “Contact Us”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 18 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
29 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at onapsis.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Hiring
- Hiring
- 7 open roles
- Teams
- Engineering (3), Sales (1), Sales Engineer (1)
- Job board
- greenhouse
- Careers page
- onapsis.com/company/careers (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on onapsis.com, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.