Website review, no card needed
onedaytests.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202641 issues · 93 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on onedaytests.com, 15 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79C- #44,755 of 98,616 reviewed websitesbeats 49%
- #28,575 of 53,873 online storesbeats 41%
- #27,343 of 48,870 Shopify storesbeats 38%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 150 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.1 s
3.2 s
4.3 s
5.3 s
6.4 s
7.5 s
8.6 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.6 s · 530 KiBAbout 530 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 s · 384 KiB23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (384 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 40
40/100Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.3 s
A phone's processor spends 5.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (FontAwesome CDN, Google Tag Manager and Clarity and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 113 KiBAbout 113 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 503 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
FontAwesome CDN adds 407 ms
407 msFontAwesome CDN costs a phone 407 ms of main-thread work and 107 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 257 KiB9 images could be 257 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
2,751 HTML elements
The page has 2,751 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Google Tag Manager adds 213 ms
213 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 213 ms of main-thread work and 421 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 42 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Duplicated JavaScript
18 KiB18 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 80 ms
80 msYour server sent the HTML in 80 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.9 s
15.9 sYour largest element takes 15.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 10.9 s
10.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 16.1 s
16.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s
4.2 sThe first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 723 ms
723 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 723 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
24 images without width and height
24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 147 ms to 150 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 133 ms
133 msReal visitors wait 133 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 610 ms
610 msReal visitors wait 610 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.5 MB in 264 requests
3.5 MBYour homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 264 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (74), other files 967 KiB (125) and images 721 KiB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
17 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example ben--15.png at 1,160 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 17 KiB.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
0.99 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.99 g of CO₂e: 118.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
6 buttons without a name
6 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
43 text elements with low contrast
43 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (16 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 58 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
53 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 6 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (83 characters)
Your title is 83 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Same day blood tests at 40+ UK clinics & home kits. UKAS 15189 lab. — One Day Tests”.
Meta description is long (260 characters)
Your meta description is 260 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
418 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 418 pages on onedaytests.com and 10 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “ACCURATE & TRUSTED BLOOD TESTS”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://onedaytests.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: DiagnosticLab, Pharmacy and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://onedaytests.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,683 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://onedaytests.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://onedaytests.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://onedaytests.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://onedaytests.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://onedaytests.com/customer_authentication/redirect and https://onedaytests.com/pages/test-finder have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 126 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.net/action/0?ti=343214561&Ver=2&mid=904f3b6d-6a27-45d1-b742-c24bf126f90b&bo=2&pi=918639831&lg=en-US&sw=390&sh=844&sc=24&nwd=1&tl=Same%20day%20blood%20tests%20at%2040%2B%20UK%20clinics.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
12 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,827 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,827 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
27 calls to action
The homepage has 27 calls to action, for example “Book a call with our GP team”, “Custom test request” and “Contact us”.
5 short forms
5 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Ads, Microsoft Clarity and Reddit Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
34 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 34 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at onedaytests.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on onedaytests.com, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.