Website review, no card needed
ongraph.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202628 issues · 80 checks
This review found 28 issues worth fixing on ongraph.com, 10 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 230 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 207 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 204 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 200 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.4 s
2.1 s
2.8 s
3.5 s
4.2 s
4.9 s
5.6 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 73
73/100Your mobile performance score is 73. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 96 KiBAbout 96 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
1,509 HTML elements
The page has 1,509 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Fonts and cloudfront.net), adding 124 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Improve image delivery
5 KiB1 image could be 5 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.0 s
A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 128 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 7 ms
7 msYour server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.4 s
8.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sThe first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sYour largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “banner image”. Most of its time is element render delay (4.8 s).
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 206 ms
206 msReal visitors wait 206 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 4.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 230 ms to 200 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.008
0.008The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.008, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.1 g of CO₂ per visit
0.12 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.12 g of CO₂e: 13.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 419 KiB in 32 requests
419 KiBYour homepage downloads 419 KiB in 32 requests on a phone: fonts 157 KiB (3), stylesheets 142 KiB (17) and images 60 KiB (7). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (109 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 109 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
18 links without text
18 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
11 form fields without a label
11 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
14 links crawlers can't follow
14 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
136 internal links, 17 external
The homepage links to 136 pages on ongraph.com and 17 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 141 characters
Your meta description is 141 characters: “We are an award-winning Web & Mobile App Development Company offering services for Android, iOS, Blockchain, AI, ML, an…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “AI First Digital Innovation for Modern Businesses”.
Title: 61 characters
Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “OnGraph: Web & App Development Company for Digital Innovation”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.ongraph.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ongraph.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,614 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.ongraph.com/llms.txt (57 KiB, 308 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 broken images
5 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.ongraph.com/.
4 small tap targets
4 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “wp is not defined”.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
About 640 words of copy
The homepage carries about 640 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT US” and “SCHEDULE A MEETING”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “schedule a meeting” and “LEARN MORE ABOUT ONGRAPH”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 26 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and “500+ Customers”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ongraph.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Vue.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 28 issues on ongraph.com, including 13 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.