Website review, no card needed

op.gg logo

op.gg website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202637 issues · 83 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on op.gg, 19 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.7 sApr 18Oct 31.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.8 s
Apr 25, 20261.8 s
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
249 ms224 msApr 18Oct 3245 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026231 ms
Apr 25, 2026233 ms
May 2, 2026232 ms
May 9, 2026231 ms
May 16, 2026230 ms
May 23, 2026230 ms
May 30, 2026229 ms
Jun 6, 2026228 ms
Jun 13, 2026227 ms
Jun 20, 2026227 ms
Jun 27, 2026230 ms
Jul 4, 2026231 ms
Jul 11, 2026232 ms
Jul 18, 2026233 ms
Jul 25, 2026238 ms
Aug 1, 2026240 ms
Aug 8, 2026241 ms
Aug 15, 2026238 ms
Aug 22, 2026231 ms
Aug 29, 2026231 ms
Sep 5, 2026235 ms
Sep 12, 2026241 ms
Sep 19, 2026246 ms
Sep 26, 2026246 ms
Oct 3, 2026245 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of op.gg (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. op.gg at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. op.gg at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. op.gg at 3.0 s3.0 s
  4. op.gg at 4.1 s4.1 s
  5. op.gg at 5.1 s5.1 s
  6. op.gg at 6.1 s6.1 s
  7. op.gg at 7.1 s7.1 s
  8. op.gg at 8.1 s8.1 s

Speed

9 to fix38
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.2 s · 1.6 MB

    About 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 2.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 67). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ZenDesk and vdo.ai and others), adding 3.1 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    700 ms · 253 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (253 KiB).

  • ZenDesk adds 153 ms

    153 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 153 ms of main-thread work and 412 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,805 HTML elements

    The page has 1,805 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    250 ms · 21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 43 KiB

    About 43 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 179 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    83 KiB

    1 image could be 83 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 67 but mobile only 38. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.43

    0.43

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.43 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.0 s

    21.0 s

    Your largest element takes 21.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “OP.GG logo (Object-Head Grand Duke Zhonya)”.

  • Time to Interactive: 34.1 s

    34.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 34.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 910 ms

    910 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 910 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 330 ms

    330 ms

    Real visitors wait 330 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 843 ms

    843 ms

    Real visitors wait 843 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 231 ms to 245 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 5.1 MB in 214 requests

    5.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 214 requests on a phone: scripts 3.5 MB (83), other files 819 KiB (53) and images 522 KiB (64). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    8 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 7a8657bf72acf80ea38793b87e2f0511.png at 666 px wide, shown at 214 px. Resized copies would save about 8 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (467 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.44 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.44 g of CO₂e: 172.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8190
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 130 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10086
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 137 internal links, 46 external

    The homepage links to 137 pages on op.gg and 46 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “LoL stats, match history, live games, and rankings for every League of Legends player. Search Summoner's Rift, ARAM, Ar…”.

  • Title: 51 characters

    Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “LoL Stats Tracker, Rankings & Match History | OP.GG”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://op.gg/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://op.gg/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (465 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://op.gg/llms.txt (4 KiB, 34 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 9 pages without an H1

    https://op.gg/tft, https://op.gg/valorant, https://op.gg/pubg, https://op.gg/overwatch, https://op.gg/roblox and https://op.gg/pokemon-pokopia and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://op.gg/pubg and https://op.gg/overwatch have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://op.gg/roblox, https://op.gg/pokemon-pokopia, https://op.gg/marvel-rivals and https://op.gg/arc-raiders took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 51 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 8885
  • 54 small tap targets

    54 of 141 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'addEventListener')”.

  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Requests the notification permission on page load

    Requests the notification permission on page load.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 329 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 329 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact us” and “Register pro player tag”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at op.gg, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on op.gg, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25