Website review, no card needed

orascomdh.com logo

orascomdh.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202648 issues · 84 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on orascomdh.com, 19 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.7 s3.4 sMay 2Oct 174.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.6 s
May 9, 20264.6 s
May 16, 20264.4 s
May 23, 20264.6 s
May 30, 20264.4 s
Jun 6, 20263.9 s
Jun 13, 20264.1 s
Jun 20, 20264.0 s
Jun 27, 20264.2 s
Jul 4, 20264.2 s
Jul 11, 20264.2 s
Jul 18, 20264.2 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.7 s
Aug 8, 20263.9 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.8 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.6 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.8 s
Oct 10, 20263.9 s
Oct 17, 20264.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
258 ms191 msMay 2Oct 17233 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026201 ms
May 9, 2026226 ms
May 16, 2026220 ms
May 23, 2026223 ms
May 30, 2026219 ms
Jun 6, 2026219 ms
Jun 13, 2026221 ms
Jun 20, 2026220 ms
Jun 27, 2026228 ms
Jul 4, 2026220 ms
Jul 11, 2026221 ms
Jul 18, 2026222 ms
Jul 25, 2026215 ms
Aug 1, 2026199 ms
Aug 8, 2026240 ms
Aug 15, 2026245 ms
Aug 22, 2026238 ms
Aug 29, 2026250 ms
Sep 5, 2026237 ms
Sep 12, 2026238 ms
Sep 19, 2026242 ms
Sep 26, 2026222 ms
Oct 3, 2026222 ms
Oct 10, 2026224 ms
Oct 17, 2026233 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of orascomdh.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. orascomdh.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. orascomdh.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. orascomdh.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. orascomdh.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. orascomdh.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. orascomdh.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. orascomdh.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. orascomdh.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix48
  • Improve image delivery

    1.0 s · 3.7 MB

    10 images could be 3.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.9 s · 629 KiB

    About 629 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 56). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Hotjar and others), adding 859 KiB and 817 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    650 ms · 249 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (249 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 380 ms

    380 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 380 ms of main-thread work and 484 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 315 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 257 ms

    257 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 257 ms of main-thread work and 225 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 35 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 24 KiB

    About 24 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 112 ms

    112 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 112 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.47

    0.47

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.47 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.6 s

    17.6 s

    Your largest element takes 17.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Andermatt, Switzerland”.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.0 s

    18.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 864 ms

    864 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 864 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 201 ms to 233 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 170 ms

    170 ms

    Real visitors wait 170 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix26
  • Page weight: 6.4 MB in 84 requests

    6.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.4 MB in 84 requests on a phone: images 4.5 MB (25), scripts 1.3 MB (23) and other files 406 KiB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    674 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example image at 1,828 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 674 KiB.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (2.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    image is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (28 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.81 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.81 g of CO₂e: 216.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9595
  • 11 text elements with low contrast

    11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 9262
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (27 characters)

    Your title is only 27 characters: “Orascom Development Holding”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (170 characters)

    Your meta description is 170 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.orascomdh.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at orascomdh.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 26 internal links, 3 external

    The homepage links to 26 pages on orascomdh.com and 3 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.orascomdh.com/.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    19%

    A phone browser shows 322 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 60. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.orascomdh.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

4 to fix76
  • 15 pages point its canonical at the homepage

    https://www.orascomdh.com/about, https://www.orascomdh.com/destinations, https://www.orascomdh.com/keys-of-life/redefining-community, https://www.orascomdh.com/investor-relations, https://www.orascomdh.com/contact-us and https://www.orascomdh.com/careers and 9 others declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.orascomdh.com/keys-of-life/redefining-community and https://www.orascomdh.com/keys-of-life all use the title “Keys Of Life”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages share a meta description

    https://www.orascomdh.com/about, https://www.orascomdh.com/destinations, https://www.orascomdh.com/keys-of-life/redefining-community, https://www.orascomdh.com/investor-relations, https://www.orascomdh.com/contact-us and https://www.orascomdh.com/careers and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.orascomdh.com/destinations, https://www.orascomdh.com/contact-us and https://www.orascomdh.com/careers have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 pages with very little text

    https://www.orascomdh.com/about, https://www.orascomdh.com/destinations, https://www.orascomdh.com/keys-of-life/redefining-community, https://www.orascomdh.com/investor-relations, https://www.orascomdh.com/contact-us and https://www.orascomdh.com/careers and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://www.orascomdh.com/esg-report-2025 and https://www.orascomdh.com/keys-of-life took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 322 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 322 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Contact IR”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at orascomdh.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on orascomdh.com, including 19 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25