Website review, no card needed

orbitmedical.com logo

orbitmedical.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202640 issues · 91 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on orbitmedical.com, 18 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s2.2 sMay 16Oct 312.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.5 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20263.5 s
Jun 6, 20263.5 s
Jun 13, 20263.5 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.8 s
Oct 31, 20262.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
124 ms91 msMay 16Oct 31105 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026119 ms
May 23, 2026116 ms
May 30, 2026120 ms
Jun 6, 2026120 ms
Jun 13, 2026119 ms
Jun 20, 2026109 ms
Jun 27, 2026116 ms
Jul 4, 2026116 ms
Jul 11, 2026116 ms
Jul 18, 2026112 ms
Jul 25, 2026106 ms
Aug 1, 2026103 ms
Aug 8, 202699 ms
Aug 15, 202695 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 2026101 ms
Sep 5, 2026101 ms
Sep 12, 2026111 ms
Sep 19, 2026111 ms
Sep 26, 2026112 ms
Oct 3, 2026111 ms
Oct 10, 202699 ms
Oct 17, 2026105 ms
Oct 24, 202696 ms
Oct 31, 2026105 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of orbitmedical.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. orbitmedical.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. orbitmedical.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. orbitmedical.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. orbitmedical.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. orbitmedical.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  6. orbitmedical.com at 5.4 s5.4 s
  7. orbitmedical.com at 6.3 s6.3 s
  8. orbitmedical.com at 7.2 s7.2 s

Speed

10 to fix32
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    7.7 s · 1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.2 s

    37 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.2 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.6 s · 333 KiB

    About 333 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 32

    32/100

    Your mobile performance score is 32. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and heyhalda.com and others), adding 3.0 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    950 ms · 156 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (156 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 684 ms

    684 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 684 ms of main-thread work and 868 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 399 ms

    399 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 399 ms of main-thread work and 741 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • heyhalda.com adds 231 ms

    231 ms

    heyhalda.com costs a phone 231 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 219 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    100 ms · 29 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    118 KiB

    3 images could be 118 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.1 s

    8.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 28.0 s

    28.0 s

    Your largest element takes 28.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Find out how to get a power wheelchair for LITTLE or NO COS…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.2 s

    28.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 15.3 s

    15.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 119 ms

    119 ms

    Real visitors wait 119 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.05

    0.05

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 105 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors

    -19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 5.9 MB in 492 requests

    5.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.9 MB in 492 requests on a phone: scripts 3.4 MB (374), fonts 1.0 MB (15) and images 679 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    21 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Go-Go-Elite-3-Wheel.jpg at 700 px wide, shown at 217 px. Resized copies would save about 21 KiB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (263 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.68 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.68 g of CO₂e: 201.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8588
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (3 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Links look like plain text

    2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (26 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 26 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 9 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9281
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url points at a different host (https://orbit-dev.successfullysmall.com/)”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 45 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 45 pages on orbitmedical.com and 20 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 134 characters

    Your meta description is 134 characters: “Bringing independence home as the leading provider of mobility equipment in the MidWest. We're here to support all your…”.

  • Title: 34 characters

    Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Mobility Solutions - Orbit Medical”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.orbitmedical.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.orbitmedical.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.orbitmedical.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (696 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 12 pages without a meta description

    https://www.orbitmedical.com/order-process, https://www.orbitmedical.com/health_professionals, https://www.orbitmedical.com/health_professionals/how-to-order, https://www.orbitmedical.com/health_professionals/referral-forms, https://www.orbitmedical.com/health_professionals/submit-referral and https://www.orbitmedical.com/health_professionals/schedule-inservice and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://www.orbitmedical.com/order-process, https://www.orbitmedical.com/health_professionals and https://www.orbitmedical.com/health_professionals/referral-forms took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 31 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 9270
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=343128810&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=59e28301-c53d-4d7c-8578-de0ea1bd7143&bo=1&sid=0dee3b10d67311f1be8d7feb893082c0&vid=0dee4f90d67311f195165760e46ac9e2&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.

  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'call')”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 511 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 511 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Order Process”, “How to Order” and “Schedule an Inservice”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 testimonial or review blocks and “over 30,000 patients”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 23 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at orbitmedical.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2022.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
WP Engine

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on orbitmedical.com, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25