Website review, no card needed
osisoft.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202646 issues · 97 checks
This review found 46 issues worth fixing on osisoft.com, 18 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 214 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
13.8 s · 3.1 MBAbout 3.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 13.8 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.9 s · 721 KiB61 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (721 KiB).
Wistia adds 1.2 s
1.2 sWistia costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.1 s
A phone's processor spends 9.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,034 HTML elements
The page has 3,034 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Wistia, Cloudflare CDN and mediavalet.com and others), adding 5.3 MB and 3.9 s of main-thread time.
Cloudflare CDN adds 821 ms
821 msCloudflare CDN costs a phone 821 ms of main-thread work and 2.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
800 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.
Google CDN adds 515 ms
515 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 515 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
mediavalet.com adds 544 ms
544 msmediavalet.com costs a phone 544 ms of main-thread work and 417 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 473 ms
473 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 473 ms of main-thread work and 614 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 269 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 60 KiBAbout 60 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 31 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
95 KiB3 images could be 95 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Duplicated JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.2 s
5.2 sReal visitors wait 5.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 5.1 s
5.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 5.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 16.7 s
16.7 sThe first text or image appears after 16.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 25.5 s
25.5 sYour largest element takes 25.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “AVEVA™ PI System™ Operations data management trusted by eng…”.
Speed Index: 16.7 s
16.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 16.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 35.5 s
35.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 238 ms
238 msReal visitors wait 238 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 46% slower for real visitors
+46%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 150 ms to 214 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.7 s to 4.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 540 ms
540 msReal visitors wait 540 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.067
0.067The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.067, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.6 MB in 189 requests
6.6 MBYour homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 189 requests on a phone: scripts 5.2 MB (81), images 493 KiB (22) and other files 432 KiB (50). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (45 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.88 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.88 g of CO₂e: 226.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Frames without titles
6 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Positive tabindex
1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (24 characters)
Your title is only 24 characters: “AVEVA PI System™ | AVEVA”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
13 links crawlers can't follow
13 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
8 links with vague text
8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
344 internal links, 31 external
The homepage links to 344 pages on osisoft.com and 31 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 133 characters
Your meta description is 133 characters: “Collect, enrich and deliver real-time operations data with AVEVA PI System to support analytics, problem-solving and de…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “AVEVA™ PI System™”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.aveva.com/en/products/aveva-pi-system/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: FAQPage.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.aveva.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,064 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.aveva.com/llms.txt (18 KiB, 138 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
6 pages share a title
https://www.aveva.com/de-de/products/aveva-pi-system, https://www.aveva.com/fr-fr/products/aveva-pi-system, https://www.aveva.com/ja-jp/products/aveva-pi-system, https://www.aveva.com/ko-kr/products/aveva-pi-system, https://www.aveva.com/pt-br/products/aveva-pi-system and https://www.aveva.com/es-es/products/aveva-pi-system all use the title “PI System™ | AVEVA”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 142 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
14 small tap targets
14 of 22 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'indexOf')”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,395 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,395 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Watch a demo” and “Contact”.
15 calls to action
The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Watch a demo” and “Contact”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Reddit Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (TrustArc) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
39 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: TrustArc
A consent management tool (TrustArc) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at osisoft.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Employees
- 600
- Founded
- 1980
- Headquarters
- San Leandro
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 46 issues on osisoft.com, including 24 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.