Website review, no card needed

otj.com logo

otj.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202638 issues · 84 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on otj.com, 15 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 14.4 MB in 46 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s1.1 sMay 16Oct 311.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.8 s
Oct 31, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
89 ms66 msMay 16Oct 3170 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202672 ms
May 23, 202677 ms
May 30, 202686 ms
Aug 1, 202671 ms
Aug 8, 202671 ms
Aug 15, 202671 ms
Aug 22, 202675 ms
Oct 3, 202670 ms
Oct 10, 202673 ms
Oct 17, 202669 ms
Oct 24, 202670 ms
Oct 31, 202670 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of otj.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. otj.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. otj.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. otj.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. otj.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. otj.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. otj.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. otj.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  8. otj.com at 4.9 s4.9 s

Speed

6 to fix74
  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Google Analytics), adding 1.3 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1,014 KiB

    About 1,014 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Mobile performance score: 74

    74/100

    Your mobile performance score is 74. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    348 KiB

    9 images could be 348 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Main-thread work: 2.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 898 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 218 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 23 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (23 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    17 KiB

    About 17 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.8 s

    12.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 695 ms

    695 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 695 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 72 ms to 70 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 71 ms

    71 ms

    Real visitors wait 71 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.9 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Together with our clients, we imagine the next generation o…”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 14.4 MB in 46 requests

    14.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.4 MB in 46 requests on a phone: media 11.9 MB (5), scripts 1.4 MB (17) and images 778 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    06_AdaHotel-768x432.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (504 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 4.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.08 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.08 g of CO₂e: 489.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 6282
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Hidden but focusable

    7 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 19 links without text

    19 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9286
  • Title is short (21 characters)

    Your title is only 21 characters: “Home — OTJ Architects”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“OTJ Architects” and “WE ARE OTJ”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 30 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 30 pages on otj.com and 4 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 141 characters

    Your meta description is 141 characters: “OTJ Architects is a premier design and architecture practice that partners with leaders in the commercial real estate, …”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://otj.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://otj.com/post-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://otj.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (378 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 9 pages without a meta description

    https://otj.com/projects/global-consulting-firm-2, https://otj.com/projects/ada-hotel, https://otj.com/projects/ambar-residences-orlando, https://otj.com/projects/martin-luther-king-jr-memorial-library, https://otj.com/projects/visitation and https://otj.com/projects/national-nonprofit and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://otj.com/connect has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7785
  • 26 small tap targets

    26 of 37 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 211 words

    The homepage has only about 211 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Learn More” and “Get in Touch”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Hotjar.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at otj.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Hotjar
Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Employees
213
Founded
1990

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on otj.com, including 12 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25