Website review, no card needed

overleaf.com logo

overleaf.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202629 issues · 93 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on overleaf.com, 9 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.5 sApr 18Oct 32.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20262.8 s
Apr 25, 20262.8 s
May 2, 20262.8 s
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
327 ms312 msApr 18Oct 3320 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026321 ms
Apr 25, 2026321 ms
May 2, 2026322 ms
May 9, 2026323 ms
May 16, 2026325 ms
May 23, 2026324 ms
May 30, 2026323 ms
Jun 6, 2026322 ms
Jun 13, 2026321 ms
Jun 20, 2026320 ms
Jun 27, 2026320 ms
Jul 4, 2026319 ms
Jul 11, 2026318 ms
Jul 18, 2026317 ms
Jul 25, 2026316 ms
Aug 1, 2026315 ms
Aug 8, 2026315 ms
Aug 15, 2026314 ms
Aug 22, 2026314 ms
Aug 29, 2026315 ms
Sep 5, 2026315 ms
Sep 12, 2026315 ms
Sep 19, 2026317 ms
Sep 26, 2026318 ms
Oct 3, 2026320 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of overleaf.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. overleaf.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. overleaf.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. overleaf.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. overleaf.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. overleaf.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. overleaf.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. overleaf.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. overleaf.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

overleaf.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

6 to fix56
  • Render-blocking requests

    9.3 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 9.3 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.6 s · 664 KiB

    11 images could be 664 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 85). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 101 KiB

    About 101 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    316 KiB

    About 316 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google CDN adds 101 ms

    101 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 101 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN and Google reCAPTCHA), adding 349 KiB and 103 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 122 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 85 but mobile only 56. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 141 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 10.2 s

    10.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 10.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    Your largest element takes 11.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Collaborative LaTeX editing in Overleaf using document shar…”.

  • Speed Index: 10.2 s

    10.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.6 s

    14.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 942 ms

    942 ms

    Real visitors wait 942 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 21 images without width and height

    21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 321 ms to 320 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 108 ms

    108 ms

    Real visitors wait 108 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.022

    0.022

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.022, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 3 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 5.3 MB in 64 requests

    5.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.3 MB in 64 requests on a phone: media 1.9 MB (3), fonts 1.5 MB (7) and images 1.2 MB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (593 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (593 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    128 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example advanced-reference-search-asset.png at 3,080 px wide, shown at 366 px. Resized copies would save about 128 KiB.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.51 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.51 g of CO₂e: 180.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 10098
  • 8 images without alt text

    8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 0 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10085
  • Title is short (29 characters)

    Your title is only 29 characters: “Overleaf, Online LaTeX Editor”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.overleaf.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 61 internal links, 29 external

    The homepage links to 61 pages on overleaf.com and 29 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 140 characters

    Your meta description is 140 characters: “An online LaTeX editor that’s easy to use. No installation, real-time collaboration, version control, hundreds of LaTeX…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Write like a rocket scientist with Overleaf— the collaborative, online LaTeX editor that anyone can use.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.overleaf.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (870 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 9 pages share a meta description

    /about/features-overview, /about/ai-features, /for/enterprises, /for/government, /for/publishers and /about/customer-stories and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /legal has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 14 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.overleaf.com/auth/google?intent=sign_up.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (overleaf.com).

  • Valid certificate (44 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR3 verifies for overleaf.com and is valid for another 44 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://overleaf.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 53 links work

    All 53 links checked from your homepage (33 internal, 20 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    overleaf.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 18 years old

    18 years

    overleaf.com was registered in Jul 2008 through Cloudflare, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only comodoca.com, digicert.com, letsencrypt.org and pki.goog to issue certificates for overleaf.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Jul 2027

    overleaf.com is registered until Jul 2027.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 731 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 731 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign up with Google” and “Sign up with ORCID”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Contact us” and “Sign up”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks and 9 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:u794683.wl184.sendgrid.net include:servers.mcsv.net ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics

Company

Headquarters
Regent Street

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 29 issues on overleaf.com, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25