Website review, no card needed

osohq.com logo

osohq.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202637 issues · 86 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on osohq.com, 15 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.5 sMay 2Oct 171.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
192 ms121 msMay 2Oct 17133 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026138 ms
May 9, 2026129 ms
May 16, 2026135 ms
May 23, 2026141 ms
May 30, 2026136 ms
Jun 6, 2026133 ms
Jun 13, 2026141 ms
Jun 20, 2026141 ms
Jun 27, 2026136 ms
Jul 4, 2026159 ms
Jul 11, 2026154 ms
Jul 18, 2026154 ms
Jul 25, 2026160 ms
Aug 1, 2026136 ms
Aug 8, 2026130 ms
Aug 15, 2026130 ms
Aug 22, 2026142 ms
Aug 29, 2026168 ms
Sep 5, 2026177 ms
Sep 12, 2026184 ms
Sep 19, 2026160 ms
Sep 26, 2026160 ms
Oct 3, 2026148 ms
Oct 10, 2026133 ms
Oct 17, 2026133 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of osohq.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. osohq.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. osohq.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. osohq.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. osohq.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. osohq.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. osohq.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. osohq.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. osohq.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix43
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.7 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.7 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.2 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    1.1 s · 145 KiB

    145 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43 (desktop: 69). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Unpkg and website-files.com and others), adding 3.4 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 713 KiB

    27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (713 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    470 ms · 104 KiB

    About 104 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 470 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 381 ms

    381 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 381 ms of main-thread work and 688 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Unpkg adds 320 ms

    320 ms

    Unpkg costs a phone 320 ms of main-thread work and 595 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • website-files.com adds 184 ms

    184 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 184 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    222 KiB

    7 images could be 222 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 156 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    81 KiB

    81 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    78 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 78 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 69 but mobile only 43. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.1 s

    8.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.9 s

    16.9 s

    Your largest element takes 16.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Agents Apps Visibility and controls to secure agents. Agent…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.2 s

    30.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.8 s

    10.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 48 images without width and height

    48 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 382 ms

    382 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 382 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.122

    0.122

    The layout shifts by 0.122 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 138 ms to 133 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 702 ms

    702 ms

    Real visitors wait 702 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.2 MB in 232 requests

    4.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 232 requests on a phone: scripts 2.9 MB (82), images 678 KiB (65) and fonts 455 KiB (22). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (65 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.20 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.20 g of CO₂e: 144.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8689
  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 201 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9288
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 80 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 80 pages on osohq.com and 11 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 126 characters

    Your meta description is 126 characters: “Oso helps companies run agents in production with confidence using monitoring, access controls, and automated least pri…”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “AI Agent Security & Control Platform | Oso for Agents”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.osohq.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: SoftwareApplication.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www-webflow.osohq.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (958 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.osohq.com/llms.txt (21 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.osohq.com/product all use the title “AI Agent Security & Control Platform | Oso for Agents”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.osohq.com/company/jobs has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 112 distorted images

    112 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    21 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 511 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 511 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book a demo” and “Learn more”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Join Our Slack” and “Contact Us”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 80 testimonial or review blocks, 3 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot and Segment.

Privacy and tracking

  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 26 cookies set on arrival

    26

    Opening the homepage sets 26 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 54 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 54 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at osohq.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Segment
Hosting
Vercel

Hiring

Hiring
7 open roles
Teams
Engineering (3), Marketing (2), Sales (2)
Job board
ashby

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on osohq.com, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25