Website review, no card needed
paradromics.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202632 issues · 79 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on paradromics.com, 16 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused CSS. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 82 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
0.9 s
1.4 s
1.8 s
2.3 s
2.7 s
3.2 s
3.6 s
Speed
Reduce unused CSS
38.9 s · 3.8 MBAbout 3.8 MB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 38.9 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
20.1 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 20.1 s.
Improve image delivery
7.5 s · 1.7 MB3 images could be 1.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.5 s faster on a phone.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (JSDelivr CDN, Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics and others), adding 23.3 MB and 268 ms of main-thread time.
Vimeo adds 0 ms
0 msVimeo costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 23.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
910 ms · 178 KiBAbout 178 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 910 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 52
52/100Your mobile performance score is 52 (desktop: 59). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 173 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 13 KiB5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (13 KiB).
Minify JavaScript
11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 2.0 s
A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 755 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 21.6 s
21.6 sThe first text or image appears after 21.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 53.0 s
53.0 sYour largest element takes 53.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Some of the most important breakthroughs”.
Speed Index: 21.6 s
21.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 21.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 53.0 s
53.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 53.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 82 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user INP: 78 ms
78 msReal visitors wait 78 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 739 ms
739 msReal visitors wait 739 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 187 ms
187 msScripts block the page for only 187 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 36.3 MB in 58 requests
36.3 MBYour homepage downloads 36.3 MB in 58 requests on a phone: media 25.6 MB (5), stylesheets 3.8 MB (7) and other files 3.8 MB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
‘I-Have-a-Lot-to-Say-Brain-Implant-Helps-a-Disabled-Patient- weighs 1.6 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
1 image far larger than shown
1,002 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example ‘I-Have-a-Lot-to-Say-Brain-Implant-Helps-a-Disabled-Patient- at 1,489 px wide, shown at 310 px. Resized copies would save about 1,002 KiB.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (1.7 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 10.3 g of CO₂ per visit
10.29 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.29 g of CO₂e: 1234.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (4 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
35 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Some of the most important breakthroughs” and “Start with a simple act of connection”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
37 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 37 pages on paradromics.com and 10 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 141 characters
Your meta description is 141 characters: “Paradromics is developing brain-computer interface technology designed to restore communication today and redefine huma…”.
Title: 47 characters
Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Brain-Computer Interface Platform | Paradromics”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://paradromics.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, Place and WebPage.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://paradromics.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (352 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://paradromics.com/llms.txt (5 KiB, 0 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages without an H1
https://paradromics.com/platform, https://paradromics.com/company and https://paradromics.com/contact have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
13 internal pages checked
We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 295 words of copy
The homepage carries about 295 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Learn More”, “Get a Closer Look” and “Join the Community”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at paradromics.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on paradromics.com, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.