Website review, no card needed

paragonone.com logo

paragonone.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202635 issues · 78 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on paragonone.com, 11 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s1.7 sMay 9Oct 241.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.6 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
263 ms116 msMay 9Oct 24133 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026195 ms
May 16, 2026197 ms
May 23, 2026200 ms
May 30, 2026202 ms
Jun 6, 2026202 ms
Jun 13, 2026207 ms
Jun 20, 2026207 ms
Jun 27, 2026213 ms
Jul 4, 2026217 ms
Jul 11, 2026222 ms
Jul 18, 2026228 ms
Jul 25, 2026243 ms
Aug 1, 2026245 ms
Aug 8, 2026246 ms
Aug 15, 2026243 ms
Aug 22, 2026233 ms
Aug 29, 2026217 ms
Sep 5, 2026194 ms
Sep 12, 2026180 ms
Sep 19, 2026161 ms
Sep 26, 2026144 ms
Oct 3, 2026142 ms
Oct 10, 2026137 ms
Oct 17, 2026136 ms
Oct 24, 2026133 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of paragonone.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. paragonone.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. paragonone.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. paragonone.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. paragonone.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. paragonone.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. paragonone.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. paragonone.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. paragonone.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix57
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.3 s · 752 KiB

    About 752 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (vercel.app, Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot and others), adding 1.4 MB and 556 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    646 KiB

    15 images could be 646 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 70 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (70 KiB).

  • vercel.app adds 259 ms

    259 ms

    vercel.app costs a phone 259 ms of main-thread work and 775 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 31 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 212 ms

    212 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 212 ms of main-thread work and 353 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,110 HTML elements

    The page has 2,110 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 111 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    16 KiB

    About 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 960 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.8 s

    15.8 s

    Your largest element takes 15.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Real-world projects that get you hired.”.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.0 s

    16.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.3 s

    5.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.8 s

    8.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 190 ms

    190 ms

    Real visitors wait 190 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 31% faster for real visitors

    -31%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 195 ms to 133 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 28% faster for real visitors

    -28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 78 ms

    78 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 78 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix33
  • Page weight: 14.1 MB in 122 requests

    14.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.1 MB in 122 requests on a phone: media 11.2 MB (12), scripts 1.5 MB (35) and images 1.0 MB (33). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images far larger than shown

    537 KiB

    8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example face_alejandra-campos.jpg at 800 px wide, shown at 56 px. Resized copies would save about 537 KiB.

  • 10 images in older formats

    10 images (768 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 12 images below the first screen load straight away

    12 images further down the page (813 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.00 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.00 g of CO₂e: 480.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9493
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (25 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 25 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (2 elements)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 24 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10092
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • 20 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 20 pages on paragonone.com and 7 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 130 characters

    Your meta description is 130 characters: “Build portfolio pieces and learn AI tools through project-based courses from big brands that strengthen your resume. $0…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Real projectsthat get you hired”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Build an AI portfolio that gets you hired with Extern”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.extern.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix75
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Some text only appears after JavaScript runs

    42%

    The HTML your server sends has 632 of the 1,519 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.extern.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.extern.com/home and / all use the title “Build an AI portfolio that gets you hired with Extern”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.extern.com/higher-ed and https://www.extern.com/wall-of-love have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    https://www.extern.com/explore/consulting and https://www.extern.com/explore/finance use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    24 of 25 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,519 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,519 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign Up · $0” and “Sign Up · $0 to start”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Start today”, “Start your project” and “Apply to be an Extern”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at paragonone.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Segment
Hosting
Webflow

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on paragonone.com, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25