Website review, no card needed

parcesa.es logo

parcesa.es website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202647 issues · 90 checks

This review found 47 issues worth fixing on parcesa.es, 23 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s3.2 sMay 2Oct 173.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.4 s
May 9, 20263.4 s
May 16, 20263.4 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.4 s
Jun 6, 20263.4 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20263.3 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20263.2 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20263.6 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.6 s
Sep 26, 20263.5 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
146 ms114 msMay 2Oct 17129 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026140 ms
May 9, 2026142 ms
May 16, 2026138 ms
May 23, 2026130 ms
May 30, 2026128 ms
Jun 6, 2026123 ms
Jun 13, 2026121 ms
Jun 20, 2026121 ms
Jun 27, 2026121 ms
Jul 4, 2026120 ms
Jul 11, 2026121 ms
Jul 18, 2026119 ms
Jul 25, 2026118 ms
Aug 1, 2026122 ms
Aug 8, 2026123 ms
Aug 15, 2026132 ms
Aug 22, 2026132 ms
Aug 29, 2026135 ms
Sep 5, 2026134 ms
Sep 12, 2026137 ms
Sep 19, 2026139 ms
Sep 26, 2026135 ms
Oct 3, 2026135 ms
Oct 10, 2026131 ms
Oct 17, 2026129 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of parcesa.es (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. parcesa.es at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. parcesa.es at 2.4 s2.4 s
  3. parcesa.es at 3.6 s3.6 s
  4. parcesa.es at 4.8 s4.8 s
  5. parcesa.es at 6.0 s6.0 s
  6. parcesa.es at 7.2 s7.2 s
  7. parcesa.es at 8.4 s8.4 s
  8. parcesa.es at 9.6 s9.6 s

Speed

16 to fix26
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 5.9 MB

    About 5.9 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    YouTube costs a phone 3.5 s of main-thread work and 9.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.8 s

    50 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.8 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.0 s · 308 KiB

    About 308 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Avoid multiple page redirects

    1.3 s

    The page goes through 2 redirects before it starts loading, costing about 1.3 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.

  • Font display

    1.3 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.3 s).

  • Main-thread work: 12.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 12.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 7.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 26

    26/100

    Your mobile performance score is 26 (desktop: 64). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Google CDN and others), adding 11.6 MB and 5.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 645 ms

    645 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 645 ms of main-thread work and 701 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    552 KiB

    1 image could be 552 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google CDN adds 403 ms

    403 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 403 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 383 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    300 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 300 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    281 KiB

    22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (281 KiB).

  • 1,580 HTML elements

    The page has 1,580 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 34 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 34 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 64 but mobile only 26. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 101 ms

    101 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 101 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    Your largest element takes 10.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “PARCESA Servicios Funerarios Integrales | Funeraria Madrid”.

  • Speed Index: 21.4 s

    21.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 21.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 80.4 s

    80.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 80.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 140 ms to 129 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 153 ms

    153 ms

    Real visitors wait 153 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.064

    0.064

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.064, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 13.9 MB in 334 requests

    13.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 13.9 MB in 334 requests on a phone: scripts 10.7 MB (121), stylesheets 903 KiB (54) and HTML 702 KiB (29). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 3.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.94 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.94 g of CO₂e: 473.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 6673
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

    Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (1 element).

  • [aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

    [aria-*] attributes do not have valid values (1 element).

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 12 text elements with low contrast

    12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts

    Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 83 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 14 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 17 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 14 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 304 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 304 pages on parcesa.es and 5 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “PARCESA es una funeraria en Madrid con más de 30 años de experiencia en la gestión de crematorios, tanatorios y cemente…”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Funeraria en Madrid | PARCESA Servicios Funerarios”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://parcesa.es/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Article, FAQPage, Organization, Person and VideoObject.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://parcesa.es/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (1 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://parcesa.es/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix93
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://parcesa.es/espacio-de-cuidadores is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 107 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    8 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 8 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 4687
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 3 low-resolution images

    3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix64
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Only about 16 words

    The homepage has only about 16 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 17 testimonial or review blocks and 61 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 8 phone links and 3 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at parcesa.es, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2024.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
1976
Headquarters
Alcobendas

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 47 issues on parcesa.es, including 26 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25