Website review, no card needed
parisicoffee.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202641 issues · 88 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on parisicoffee.com, 13 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81B- #32,083 of 94,759 reviewed websitesbeats 61%
- #20,414 of 50,944 online storesbeats 53%
- #19,629 of 46,068 Shopify storesbeats 51%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 99 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.1 s
1.7 s
2.2 s
2.8 s
3.3 s
3.9 s
4.5 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.9 s · 867 KiBAbout 867 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.9 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.6 s · 286 KiB10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (286 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
Mobile performance score: 52
52/100Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Bold Commerce, Shopify and Klaviyo and others), adding 2.3 MB and 738 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
350 ms · 45 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 45 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 44 KiBAbout 44 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.1 s
A phone's processor spends 3.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Bold Commerce adds 191 ms
191 msBold Commerce costs a phone 191 ms of main-thread work and 485 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 127 ms
127 msShopify costs a phone 127 ms of main-thread work and 877 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,086 HTML elements
The page has 2,086 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Klaviyo adds 104 ms
104 msKlaviyo costs a phone 104 ms of main-thread work and 312 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 228 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
120 ms · 16 KiB16 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Duplicated JavaScript
84 KiB84 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Improve image delivery
36 KiB3 images could be 36 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 21.2 s
21.2 sYour largest element takes 21.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “BlackFridayMobileSlideHero.jpg”.
Time to Interactive: 21.4 s
21.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.3 s
9.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 375 ms
375 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 375 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 112 ms
112 msReal visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 541 ms
541 msReal visitors wait 541 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 99 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors
-20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.9 MB in 313 requests
3.9 MBYour homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 313 requests on a phone: scripts 2.0 MB (83), other files 1,011 KiB (172) and images 565 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
FincaElPlacer_SlideshowMobileHero.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.11 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.11 g of CO₂e: 133.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
34 buttons without a name
34 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Invalid ARIA attributes
3 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (52 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 52 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (3 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h6, h4 → h6 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 16 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Parisi Coffee”, “Coffee Partnerships & Commercial Capabilities” and “STORIES FROM THE CUP”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (190 characters)
Your meta description is 190 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
259 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 259 pages on parisicoffee.com and 10 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 46 characters
Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Parisi Coffee | Fresh Roasted Specialty Coffee”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://parisicoffee.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://parisicoffee.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://parisicoffee.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,044 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://parisicoffee.com/pages/locations-old, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://parisicoffee.com/collections/coffee all use the title “Parisi Coffee | Fresh Roasted Specialty Coffee”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
8 pages without a meta description
https://parisicoffee.com/pages/coffee-subscriptions, https://parisicoffee.com/pages/manage-subscriptions, https://parisicoffee.com/collections/merchandise, https://parisicoffee.com/blogs/news, https://parisicoffee.com/pages/faq and https://parisicoffee.com/pages/locations and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
https://parisicoffee.com/pages/locations, https://parisicoffee.com/pages/wholesale and https://parisicoffee.com/pages/private-label-contract-manufacturing have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
151 of 154 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 622 words of copy
The homepage carries about 622 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop All Coffee” and “Contact Us”.
33 calls to action
The homepage has 33 calls to action, for example “Shop All Coffee”, “Shop” and “Shop Coffee”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 12 phone links and 12 email links.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
38 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 38 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at parisicoffee.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on parisicoffee.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.