Website review, no card needed
pedrogarcia.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202627 issues · 74 checks
This review found 27 issues worth fixing on pedrogarcia.com, 7 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78C- #50,073 of 98,489 reviewed websitesbeats 44%
- #31,677 of 53,779 online storesbeats 36%
- #30,193 of 48,777 Shopify storesbeats 33%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 245 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 247 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 246 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.2 s
1.6 s
2.0 s
2.4 s
2.8 s
3.2 s
Speed
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and TikTok and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 59
59/100Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
950 ms9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.
Improve image delivery
650 ms · 123 KiB6 images could be 123 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 81 KiBAbout 81 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 467 ms
467 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 467 ms of main-thread work and 379 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.9 s
A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
329 KiBAbout 329 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Shopify adds 188 ms
188 msShopify costs a phone 188 ms of main-thread work and 384 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 231 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
191 KiB22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (191 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
40 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 38 ms
38 msYour server sent the HTML in 38 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.2 s
9.2 sYour largest element takes 9.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 21.2 s
21.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user INP: 284 ms
284 msReal visitors wait 284 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 5.3 s
5.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 474 ms
474 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 474 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 245 ms to 246 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 483 ms
483 msReal visitors wait 483 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s
1.3 sThe first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.7 MB in 378 requests
3.7 MBYour homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 378 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (154), other files 966 KiB (161) and images 894 KiB (34). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (36 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.06 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.06 g of CO₂e: 127.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
6 images without alt text
6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
23 links without text
23 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
29 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 29 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 29 passed and 0 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
104 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 104 pages on pedrogarcia.com and 12 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 127 characters
Your meta description is 127 characters: “Compra online zapatos de lujo de la tienda online oficial de Pedro García. Diseñados y hechos a mano con materiales de …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Pedro García”.
Title: 56 characters
Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Pedro García | Zapatos hechos en España | Tienda oficial”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://pedrogarcia.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pedrogarcia.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://pedrogarcia.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without an H1
https://pedrogarcia.com/collections/sandalias has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 49 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=5668443&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=30a92f89-01e6-43d7-bde1-7a13cdfe4e80&bo=3&sid=4b470510da6f11f198bfcd9e3a4bf689&vid=4b472700da6f11f18590d1a994688108&vids=0&msclkid=N&pi=918.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Identifier 'section' has already been declared”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
14 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 72 words
The homepage has only about 72 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “the shearling shop”, “the gift shop” and “100th anniversary book”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
30 cookies set on arrival
30Opening the homepage sets 30 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
48 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 48 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pedrogarcia.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 18 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Consentmo Gdpr · Bss B2b Solution · Hreflang Manager · Triplewhale · Pixelpro Easy Pixel Install · Yotpo Product Reviews · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Se Wishlist Engine · Gdpr Backpack · Orbe Geolocation · Tiktok Pixel For Adtrace · Simple Social Login · prezenapps.com · bsscommerce.com · adroll.com · amazonaws.com · cloudfront.net · azurewebsites.net
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Madrid
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 27 issues on pedrogarcia.com, including 15 speed issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.