Website review, no card needed

peekup.de logo

peekup.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202626 issues · 78 checks

This review found 26 issues worth fixing on peekup.de, 11 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s1.5 sMay 16Oct 311.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.3 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.4 s
Jun 6, 20263.3 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.2 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.8 s
Oct 31, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
226 ms128 msMay 16Oct 31201 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026149 ms
May 23, 2026150 ms
May 30, 2026152 ms
Jun 6, 2026150 ms
Jun 13, 2026146 ms
Jun 20, 2026145 ms
Jun 27, 2026140 ms
Jul 4, 2026140 ms
Jul 11, 2026142 ms
Jul 18, 2026145 ms
Jul 25, 2026145 ms
Aug 1, 2026142 ms
Aug 8, 2026140 ms
Aug 15, 2026139 ms
Aug 22, 2026139 ms
Aug 29, 2026143 ms
Sep 5, 2026149 ms
Sep 12, 2026156 ms
Sep 19, 2026171 ms
Sep 26, 2026193 ms
Oct 3, 2026210 ms
Oct 10, 2026215 ms
Oct 17, 2026214 ms
Oct 24, 2026206 ms
Oct 31, 2026201 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of peekup.de (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. peekup.de at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. peekup.de at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. peekup.de at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. peekup.de at 3.0 s3.0 s
  5. peekup.de at 3.7 s3.7 s
  6. peekup.de at 4.5 s4.5 s
  7. peekup.de at 5.2 s5.2 s
  8. peekup.de at 5.9 s5.9 s

Speed

7 to fix25
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.3 s · 1.0 MB

    About 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 25

    25/100

    Your mobile performance score is 25. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 993 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 130 KiB

    About 130 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 750 ms.

  • 2,433 HTML elements

    The page has 2,433 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Usercentrics CMP, Infopark and scrivito.com), adding 342 KiB and 128 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 10 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    58 KiB

    1 image could be 58 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 253 ms

    253 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 253 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.35

    0.35

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.35 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.1 s

    14.1 s

    Your largest element takes 14.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Um Deinen Besuch auf unserer Website optimal zu gestalten, …”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.1 s

    14.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 36% slower for real visitors

    +36%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 149 ms to 201 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.237

    0.237

    The layout shifts by 0.237 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 194 ms

    194 ms

    Real visitors wait 194 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 356 ms

    356 ms

    Real visitors wait 356 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 48% faster for real visitors

    -48%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.1 MB in 46 requests

    2.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 46 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (15), stylesheets 140 KiB (1) and fonts 133 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.59 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.59 g of CO₂e: 70.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9799
  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 0 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9291
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 332 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 332 pages on peekup.de and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 77 characters

    Your meta description is 77 characters: “Sperrmüll in Berlin, Abholung oder selbst entsorgen auf dem BSR Recyclinghof.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Sperrmüllabfuhr: Sperrmüll einfach abholen lassen”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Sperrmüllabfuhr: Sperrmüll einfach abholen lassen | BSR”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.bsr.de/sperrmuell-buchen.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bsr.de/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.bsr.de/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,637 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 159 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    11 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 783 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 783 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Shop”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 4 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at peekup.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Scrivito by JustRelate Group GmbH (scrivito.com)
Framework
Tailwind CSS
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 26 issues on peekup.de, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25