Website review, no card needed

perryprotech.com logo

perryprotech.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202631 issues · 93 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on perryprotech.com, 11 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.6 s586 msMay 9Oct 245.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.7 s
Sep 19, 20263.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.9 s
Oct 3, 20264.4 s
Oct 10, 20264.6 s
Oct 17, 20264.6 s
Oct 24, 20265.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
80 ms62 msSep 5Oct 2470 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Sep 5, 202664 ms
Sep 12, 202667 ms
Sep 19, 202671 ms
Sep 26, 202671 ms
Oct 3, 202678 ms
Oct 10, 202673 ms
Oct 17, 202670 ms
Oct 24, 202670 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

9 to fix57
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and elementor.com and others), adding 1.2 MB and 847 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 122 KiB

    About 122 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 664 ms

    664 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 664 ms of main-thread work and 629 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    457 KiB

    About 457 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Main-thread work: 3.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 315 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • WordPress adds 12 ms

    12 ms

    WordPress costs a phone 12 ms of main-thread work and 383 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 60 KiB

    9 images could be 60 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    200 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    126 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (126 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 90 ms

    90 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 90 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Real visitors wait 5.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors wait 4.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 10.9 s

    10.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Your largest element takes 5.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Network Security ✦ Imaging ✦ Technology Business technology…”. Most of its time is resource load delay (5.2 s).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 158% slower for real visitors

    +158%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 5.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 454 ms

    454 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 454 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 17 images without width and height

    17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 64 ms to 70 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.025

    0.025

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.025, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 17.2 MB in 96 requests

    17.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 17.2 MB in 96 requests on a phone: media 14.7 MB (1), scripts 1.2 MB (40) and fonts 810 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 4.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.88 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.88 g of CO₂e: 585.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8982
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 30 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 9 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 12 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 9 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 39 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 39 pages on perryprotech.com and 9 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 137 characters

    Your meta description is 137 characters: “Simplify your IT, printing, cybersecurity, and document workflows with Perry proTECH. We help businesses reduce costs a…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Business technology that works as hard as you do.”.

  • Title: 61 characters

    Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “Business Tech Solutions in Ohio, Ind. & Mich. | Perry proTECH”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://perryprotech.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://perryprotech.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without an H1

    /readiship and /the-hub have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 5 pages slow to respond

    /printers-and-copiers, /production-print-services, /managed-it-network-services, /network-security and /translation-software took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10092
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (perryprotech.com).

  • Valid certificate (42 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR1 verifies for perryprotech.com and is valid for another 42 days.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://perryprotech.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 32 links work

    All 32 links checked from your homepage (25 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    perryprotech.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    perryprotech.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 14 years old

    14 years

    perryprotech.com was registered in May 2012 through NameCheap, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until May 2028

    perryprotech.com is registered until May 2028.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Only about 33 words

    The homepage has only about 33 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Service Request”, “Supply Request” and “Schedule Free Assessment”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 17 testimonial or review blocks, 5 customer or partner logos, 29 trust badges and “1,250+ reviews”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_u.perryprotech.com._spf.dmarclc.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.4.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 3.7.1
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
WordPress.com

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on perryprotech.com, including 20 speed issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25