Website review, no card needed

petprinted.es logo

petprinted.es website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202634 issues · 82 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on petprinted.es, 8 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.9 sMay 23Nov 73.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.2 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Oct 24, 20263.3 s
Oct 31, 20263.1 s
Nov 7, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
348 ms200 msMay 23Nov 7331 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026220 ms
May 30, 2026217 ms
Jun 6, 2026221 ms
Jun 13, 2026229 ms
Jun 20, 2026228 ms
Jun 27, 2026221 ms
Jul 4, 2026223 ms
Jul 11, 2026231 ms
Jul 18, 2026255 ms
Jul 25, 2026259 ms
Aug 1, 2026272 ms
Aug 8, 2026261 ms
Aug 15, 2026268 ms
Aug 22, 2026279 ms
Aug 29, 2026265 ms
Sep 5, 2026282 ms
Sep 12, 2026273 ms
Sep 19, 2026274 ms
Sep 26, 2026281 ms
Oct 3, 2026304 ms
Oct 10, 2026310 ms
Oct 17, 2026318 ms
Oct 24, 2026319 ms
Oct 31, 2026310 ms
Nov 7, 2026331 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of petprinted.es (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. petprinted.es at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. petprinted.es at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. petprinted.es at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. petprinted.es at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. petprinted.es at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. petprinted.es at 2.5 s2.5 s
  7. petprinted.es at 2.9 s2.9 s
  8. petprinted.es at 3.4 s3.4 s

Speed

7 to fix72
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • 4,750 HTML elements

    The page has 4,750 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 72

    72/100

    Your mobile performance score is 72. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Main-thread work: 3.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    362 KiB

    About 362 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Improve image delivery

    257 KiB

    13 images could be 257 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Klaviyo adds 109 ms

    109 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 109 ms of main-thread work and 309 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Klaviyo, loox.io and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 695 KiB and 386 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    200 ms · 107 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (107 KiB).

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 216 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 22 KiB

    About 22 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 68 ms

    68 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 68 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.4 s

    16.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Your largest element takes 5.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “4.9 de más de 1.000 reseñas Piezas únicas para humanos y an…”.

  • Tap response (INP) got 47% slower for real visitors

    +47%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 220 ms to 331 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 967 ms

    967 ms

    Real visitors wait 967 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.3 s

    5.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 25 images without width and height

    25 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 273 ms

    273 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 273 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.7 MB in 328 requests

    3.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 328 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (94), images 1.2 MB (54) and other files 910 KiB (136). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.05 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.05 g of CO₂e: 126.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8893
  • 7 images without alt text

    7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (5 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • Title is long (87 characters)

    Your title is 87 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Pet Printed - Artículos de regalo personalizados para los amantes de l – Pet Printed ES”.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “Más de 584.000 felices amantes de animales”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 129 internal links, 28 external

    The homepage links to 129 pages on petprinted.es and 28 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “Únicos, elegantes y personales: Pet Printed convierte a tu peludito en una obra de arte única. Ideal como regalo para t…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://petprinted.es/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://petprinted.es/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,879 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://petprinted.es/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://petprinted.es/collections/all, https://petprinted.es/policies/shipping-policy, https://petprinted.es/collections/bestseller, https://petprinted.es/collections/nuevos, https://petprinted.es/collections/felpudos and https://petprinted.es/collections/calcetines and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 13 pages without an H1

    https://petprinted.es/collections/all, https://petprinted.es/collections/bestseller, https://petprinted.es/collections/nuevos, https://petprinted.es/collections/felpudos, https://petprinted.es/collections/calcetines and https://petprinted.es/collections/camisetas and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 50 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    24 of 27 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 831 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 831 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 34 testimonial or review blocks and 4 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity and Hotjar.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 29 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at petprinted.es, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 10 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Pandectes Gdpr · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Teeinblue Product Personalizer · Delm · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Checkout Regeln Grosse Warenkoerbe 2026 · Sales Shield · Stape Remix · loox.io · kiwisizing.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on petprinted.es, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25